The Lindsay Clancy trial was never simply about whether she killed her three children. The central question was far more difficult: did postpartum psychosis destroy her ability to understand that her actions were wrong? Brandy Diamond examines the testimony, competing arguments, and devastating unanswered questions behind a case that left a jury deadlocked 11-1.Clancy, a Massachusetts mother and former labor and delivery nurse, was charged with killing five-year-old Cora, three-year-old Dawson, and eight-month-old Callan in January 2023 before attempting suicide and surviving with severe spinal injuries. Both sides agreed she caused the deaths. What they disputed was what was happening inside her mind.Brandy breaks down:

• Patrick Clancy's devastating account of returning home, discovering the blood in the bedroom, and finding his children in the basement
• The 911 call that reporters said they would never forget
• Clancy's psychiatric history, postpartum depression, psychosis, suicidal thoughts, hospitalizations, and medication changes
• The journals that appeared to shift from legible writing into what her attorney described as “chicken scratch”
• The prosecution's argument that she planned the killings, understood her actions, and retained awareness of their wrongfulness
• The defense's case that hallucinations, delusions, and a catastrophic psychiatric breakdown made her incapable of appreciating what she was doing
• Why 11 jurors reportedly favored a finding of not criminally responsible, while one juror refused to agree
• What the September 29 hearing could mean, including the possibility of another trial

This episode also considers the wider failures and uncertainties surrounding mental-health treatment: multiple doctors, incomplete communication between providers, questions about medication management, and a mother repeatedly seeking help while her condition deteriorated. Where does illness end and criminal responsibility begin? And what happens when the legal system must draw that line after irreversible harm?Brandy brings a personal perspective to the conversation, reflecting on her own experience with postpartum depression and grief while keeping the focus where it belongs: on the three children whose lives were taken. This is a careful look at mental illness, accountability, medical care, and the warning signs families cannot afford to ignore.

A single drop of blood, a grainy surveillance video, and a 14-year-old mystery have led police to charge a Dallas-area realtor with capital murder. But is that enough to prove who killed Irasema Chavez? This episode examines the latest development in Chavez's 2012 Arlington apartment murder. Investigators found almost no physical evidence at the scene, yet recovered one crucial clue: a fresh drop of blood on the bedroom nightstand. Years later, DNA analysis, genetic genealogy, and a sample recovered from discarded trash allegedly connected the blood to Myra Velasquez, who was arrested and later released on $450,000 bond.You'll hear how surveillance footage captured a hooded figure entering Chavez's apartment shortly before the recording abruptly stopped, why the video has never clearly identified the killer, and how a 2016 genetic composite helped move the investigation forward. The episode also looks at Velasquez's strict bond conditions, her public claim of innocence, and the questions her defense says police still need to answer.The biggest mystery may be motive. Chavez suffered more than 100 stab wounds, and investigators initially described the crime as possibly involving a jealous or scorned lover. At the time, Chavez's relationship had ended that same day, while a 2012 tip alleged that Velasquez's husband was jealous of the friendship between the two women. Could the breakup, jealousy, or another undisclosed relationship explain the violence? With Velasquez now facing a capital murder charge, the case raises a critical question: does the DNA evidence point to the killer, or simply to someone who had previously been inside Chavez's apartment? Listen for the details behind the arrest, the evidence police have not yet released, and the unresolved questions that could shape the case in court.