<![CDATA[Injustice for All with Robert Simels]]>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over the course of his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.


As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.


Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.


Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://feeds.acast.com/public/shows/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simelsRiverside.fm (https://riverside.com)Sat, 10 Oct 2026 15:04:46 GMTThu, 07 May 2026 00:37:01 GMT60Robert Simels<p>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over the course of his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.</p><br /><p>As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.</p><br /><p>Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.</p><br /><p>Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.</p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>episodicRobert Simelsrobertsimels@gmail.comno<![CDATA[The State of the BOPs | Episode 27 with Walter Pavlo]]>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.

As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.

Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.

Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.

]]>bbd9a006-4798-487c-ad24-6f2ad3272162Mon, 05 Oct 2026 20:19:34 GMT<p>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.</p><p>As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.</p><p>Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.</p><p>Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.</p>no01:23:59The State of the BOPs | Episode 27 with Walter Pavlofull<![CDATA[Insight from a Former Ethics Counselor | Episode 26 with Richard Painter ]]>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.

As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.

Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.

Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.

]]>727b402b-1457-473f-8821-a770ef7e1e5cFri, 02 Oct 2026 15:52:46 GMT<p>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.</p><p>As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.</p><p>Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.</p><p>Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.</p>no01:45:44Insight from a Former Ethics Counselor | Episode 26 with Richard Painter full<![CDATA[Advice From a Former Probation Officer | Episode 25 with Katheline O'Boyle ]]>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.


As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.


Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.


Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.

]]>329c1e23-6728-4827-b2a9-8434d8f945f5Mon, 28 Sep 2026 17:32:41 GMT<p>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.</p><p><br /></p><p>As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.</p><p><br /></p><p>Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.</p><p><br /></p><p>Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.</p>no01:37:03Advice From a Former Probation Officer | Episode 25 with Katheline O'Boyle full<![CDATA[Lawyer, Inmate, & Advocate for Reform | Episode 24 with Jeff Grant ]]>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.


As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.


Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.


Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.




]]>60e55e29-6a62-4533-8eb1-f09803e8353aMon, 28 Sep 2026 17:30:59 GMT<p>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.</p><p><br /></p><p>As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.</p><p><br /></p><p>Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.</p><p><br /></p><p>Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p>no01:24:06Lawyer, Inmate, & Advocate for Reform | Episode 24 with Jeff Grant full<![CDATA[17 Years in Prison for a Crime He DID NOT Commit | Episode 23 with Marty Tankleff ]]>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.

As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.

Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.

Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.

]]>1e2d47b6-0fca-49fa-abbb-c032416ff2b1Mon, 21 Sep 2026 19:56:49 GMT<p>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.<br /><br />As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.<br /><br />Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.<br /><br />Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.</p>no01:49:3217 Years in Prison for a Crime He DID NOT Commit | Episode 23 with Marty Tankleff full<![CDATA[Combating the DOJ's Persecution | Episode 22 with James Pearce]]>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.

As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.

Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.

Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.

]]>e9ef6d03-12cd-4aed-9ef6-f45ea2f81447Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:17:55 GMT<p>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.<br /><br />As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.<br /><br />Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.<br /><br />Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.</p>no01:26:32Combating the DOJ's Persecution | Episode 22 with James Pearcefull<![CDATA[Surviving Federal Prison With a 213 Year Sentence | Episode 21 with Adam Clausen]]>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.

As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.

Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.

Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.

]]>d030f5a9-7b15-4188-8b52-c47cbde8e069Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:15:50 GMT<p>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.<br /><br />As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.<br /><br />Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.<br /><br />Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.</p>no01:59:29Surviving Federal Prison With a 213 Year Sentence | Episode 21 with Adam Clausenfull<![CDATA[The State of the BOP's Medical Care | Episode 20 with Charles Howard ]]>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.

As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.

Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.

Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.

]]>ab9e9c2e-0649-4d06-af1e-74aa9bd0eb64Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:14:11 GMT<p>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.<br /><br />As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.<br /><br />Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.<br /><br />Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.</p><p></p>no01:06:59The State of the BOP's Medical Care | Episode 20 with Charles Howard full<![CDATA[27 Years of Recollections | Episode 18 with Former US District Court Judge Mark Bennett]]>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.

As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.

Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.

Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.

]]>bb047029-abbc-4890-82a9-2ab18397d8acSun, 20 Sep 2026 21:11:41 GMT<p>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.<br /><br />As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.<br /><br />Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.<br /><br />Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.</p><p></p>no01:37:4727 Years of Recollections | Episode 18 with Former US District Court Judge Mark Bennettfull<![CDATA[The State of the FBI | Episode 17 with Cassie Chandler]]>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.

As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.

Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.

Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.

]]>d2d8f24c-2576-4c35-80d6-08d9289492bcSun, 20 Sep 2026 21:08:48 GMT<p>Robert Simels is a former New York City criminal defense attorney renowned for his unwavering commitment to protecting the rights of the accused. Over his decades-long career, Simels handled some of the city’s most challenging and high-profile cases, building a reputation as a formidable advocate with an exceptional 90% success rate in criminal trials.<br /><br />As the host of Injustice for All, Simels brings his wealth of experience and insider perspective to an unfiltered examination of the American criminal justice system. Drawing on firsthand accounts, legal insight, and stories from the front lines of the courtroom, he sheds light on the structural flaws, hidden agendas, and human consequences that too often go unchallenged.<br /><br />Having witnessed the system at its best and its worst — including facing his own legal controversies — Simels now uses Injustice for All to confront uncomfortable truths, ask difficult questions, and give voice to those silenced by a system that too often prioritizes convictions over fairness.<br /><br />Join Robert Simels for candid discussions, sharp analysis, and a rare glimpse behind the legal curtain — from a man who spent his life fighting for justice when the odds were stacked against it.</p>no01:31:01The State of the FBI | Episode 17 with Cassie Chandlerfull<![CDATA[What’s Really Happening Inside the DOJ?]]>This episode of 'Injustice for All' features attorney Paul Pelletier, who shares his extensive experience from his 27 years at the Department of Justice and the US Attorney's Office in Miami. Alongside host Robert, they discuss the current state of the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the DEA, touching upon issues of political influence, organizational flaws, and the importance of writing skills for federal prosecutors. Pelletier recounts his journey from law school to becoming a federal prosecutor, his views on the necessity of these agencies despite their flaws, and the concept of discretion in prosecution. The conversation also delves into the grand jury process, the importance of drafting compelling indictments, and the challenges of prosecuting white-collar crimes. They conclude by expressing concerns over recent political actions impacting these federal institutions and the long-term effects this may have.


00:00 Introduction and Overview

00:26 Guest Introduction: Paul Pelletier

00:45 Perry Mason and Legal Ethics

02:16 Current Issues in the Department of Justice

03:38 Historical Context of Federal Agencies

04:09 Challenges and Reforms in Law Enforcement

05:48 Interview with Paul Pelletier Begins

06:14 Paul Pelletier's Career Path

07:47 Clerkship Experience and Its Importance

09:36 Writing Skills in Legal Practice

15:39 Federal vs. State Prosecution

23:03 Discretion in Prosecution

30:56 Prosecutorial Discretion and Grand Juries

32:01 The Power and Responsibility of Federal Prosecutors

33:39 Differences Between Federal and State Grand Juries

34:33 The Role of Subpoenas in Federal Investigations

35:12 Handling Evidence in Grand Jury Investigations

36:44 Challenges in Presenting Evidence to Grand Juries

43:15 Unindicted Co-Conspirators and Legal Implications

49:29 Brady Information and Prosecutorial Discretion

53:40 The Decline of DOJ's White Collar Prosecutions

57:37 Political Influence and the Future of DOJ

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/696503c275c092ac4ef9855d696503c275c092ac4ef9855dMon, 12 Jan 2026 14:22:58 GMT<p>This episode of 'Injustice for All' features attorney Paul Pelletier, who shares his extensive experience from his 27 years at the Department of Justice and the US Attorney's Office in Miami. Alongside host Robert, they discuss the current state of the Department of Justice, the FBI, and the DEA, touching upon issues of political influence, organizational flaws, and the importance of writing skills for federal prosecutors. Pelletier recounts his journey from law school to becoming a federal prosecutor, his views on the necessity of these agencies despite their flaws, and the concept of discretion in prosecution. The conversation also delves into the grand jury process, the importance of drafting compelling indictments, and the challenges of prosecuting white-collar crimes. They conclude by expressing concerns over recent political actions impacting these federal institutions and the long-term effects this may have.</p><br /><p>00:00 Introduction and Overview</p><p>00:26 Guest Introduction: Paul Pelletier</p><p>00:45 Perry Mason and Legal Ethics</p><p>02:16 Current Issues in the Department of Justice</p><p>03:38 Historical Context of Federal Agencies</p><p>04:09 Challenges and Reforms in Law Enforcement</p><p>05:48 Interview with Paul Pelletier Begins</p><p>06:14 Paul Pelletier's Career Path</p><p>07:47 Clerkship Experience and Its Importance</p><p>09:36 Writing Skills in Legal Practice</p><p>15:39 Federal vs. State Prosecution</p><p>23:03 Discretion in Prosecution</p><p>30:56 Prosecutorial Discretion and Grand Juries</p><p>32:01 The Power and Responsibility of Federal Prosecutors</p><p>33:39 Differences Between Federal and State Grand Juries</p><p>34:33 The Role of Subpoenas in Federal Investigations</p><p>35:12 Handling Evidence in Grand Jury Investigations</p><p>36:44 Challenges in Presenting Evidence to Grand Juries</p><p>43:15 Unindicted Co-Conspirators and Legal Implications</p><p>49:29 Brady Information and Prosecutorial Discretion</p><p>53:40 The Decline of DOJ's White Collar Prosecutions</p><p>57:37 Political Influence and the Future of DOJ</p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no01:02:239What’s Really Happening Inside the DOJ?full<![CDATA[The Ugly Truth About Prosecutorial Misconduct]]>In this episode of 'Injustice For All', host Robert interviews Bennett Gershman, a distinguished professor of law at Pace Law School and an expert on prosecutorial misconduct. They delve into topics including the systemic failures in the criminal justice system, the power and discretion of prosecutors, the Brady rule on disclosing exculpatory evidence, and the complacency and error within the prosecutorial ranks. Gershman, reflecting on his prosecutorial career and academic work, emphasizes the ethical challenges faced by prosecutors and the frequent miscarriages of justice. They also discuss the Ghislaine Maxwell case and its connection to the precedent set by Bel v. New York, highlighting issues in plea agreements and victims' rights. Gershman critiques the lack of accountability and discipline for prosecutors and warns of the broader implications on democracy and ethics in the legal system.


00:00 Introduction and Overview

00:21 Meet Bennett Gershman: A Legal Luminary

01:13 Prosecutorial Misconduct: An In-Depth Discussion

01:36 The Ghislaine Maxwell Case and Plea Agreements

02:48 Bennett Gershman's Career and Contributions

04:05 The Challenges and Ethics of Being a Prosecutor

05:29 The Importance of Prosecutorial Integrity

10:18 The Role of Prosecutors in Miscarriages of Justice

11:41 The Power and Accountability of Prosecutors

17:31 Brady Violations and the Harmless Error Rule

32:36 The Influence of Judges and Prosecutors

34:44 The Imbalance in the Criminal Justice System

37:27 The Collapse of the System and Plea Bargains

39:11 The State of Prisons and Incarceration Conditions

40:41 Wrongful Convictions and Exonerations

43:43 Prosecutorial Misconduct and Legal Failures

48:41 The Impact of Political Influence on the Legal System

50:24 Strategic Litigation and Free Speech

57:53 The Erosion of Voting Rights and Democracy

59:33 Ghislaine Maxwell's Case and Victims' Rights

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/695c299a29db57949e8657ea695c299a29db57949e8657eaMon, 05 Jan 2026 21:14:02 GMT<p>In this episode of 'Injustice For All', host Robert interviews Bennett Gershman, a distinguished professor of law at Pace Law School and an expert on prosecutorial misconduct. They delve into topics including the systemic failures in the criminal justice system, the power and discretion of prosecutors, the Brady rule on disclosing exculpatory evidence, and the complacency and error within the prosecutorial ranks. Gershman, reflecting on his prosecutorial career and academic work, emphasizes the ethical challenges faced by prosecutors and the frequent miscarriages of justice. They also discuss the Ghislaine Maxwell case and its connection to the precedent set by Bel v. New York, highlighting issues in plea agreements and victims' rights. Gershman critiques the lack of accountability and discipline for prosecutors and warns of the broader implications on democracy and ethics in the legal system.</p><br /><p>00:00 Introduction and Overview</p><p>00:21 Meet Bennett Gershman: A Legal Luminary</p><p>01:13 Prosecutorial Misconduct: An In-Depth Discussion</p><p>01:36 The Ghislaine Maxwell Case and Plea Agreements</p><p>02:48 Bennett Gershman's Career and Contributions</p><p>04:05 The Challenges and Ethics of Being a Prosecutor</p><p>05:29 The Importance of Prosecutorial Integrity</p><p>10:18 The Role of Prosecutors in Miscarriages of Justice</p><p>11:41 The Power and Accountability of Prosecutors</p><p>17:31 Brady Violations and the Harmless Error Rule</p><p>32:36 The Influence of Judges and Prosecutors</p><p>34:44 The Imbalance in the Criminal Justice System</p><p>37:27 The Collapse of the System and Plea Bargains</p><p>39:11 The State of Prisons and Incarceration Conditions</p><p>40:41 Wrongful Convictions and Exonerations</p><p>43:43 Prosecutorial Misconduct and Legal Failures</p><p>48:41 The Impact of Political Influence on the Legal System</p><p>50:24 Strategic Litigation and Free Speech</p><p>57:53 The Erosion of Voting Rights and Democracy</p><p>59:33 Ghislaine Maxwell's Case and Victims' Rights</p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no01:09:136The Ugly Truth About Prosecutorial Misconductfull<![CDATA[Why Justice Fails - Corruption in the Courtroom]]>In this episode of 'Injustice for All,' host Robert Simels discusses the complexities and challenges of different types of cases, particularly white-collar crime, with guest attorney Jonathan Baum. Baum shares his varied professional background, from being a speechwriter for Bono and Bill Gates to becoming a criminal defense attorney. The conversation covers significant cases Baum was involved in, including the Mike Lynch fraud case and the OneTaste investigation. Baum provides insights into the disparities between defense and prosecution resources, the challenges of representing clients without significant funds, and the psychological pressures both clients and attorneys face in contentious legal battles. They also touch on issues of government overreach, the difficulties of habeas corpus petitions, and the often-oversimplified narrative of victimization in the legal system. The discussion emphasizes the importance of financial resources and nuanced advocacy in achieving justice.


00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All

00:46 Understanding White Collar Crime

01:29 Challenges in Legal Defense

03:11 Introducing Jonathan Baum

04:14 Jonathan's Career Journey

07:24 The Role of Law Clerks

10:34 Habeas Corpus and Pro Se Clerks

16:28 The Reality of Prosecutors

20:02 The Mike Lynch Case

25:39 The OneTaste Case

36:57 The Backpage Prosecution

37:33 Backpage Prosecution Overview

38:39 Challenges of Defending Backpage

40:27 The Lynch Case: A Complex Defense

42:53 The Role of Testimony in Trials

48:36 The Reality of Plea Bargains

53:01 Cooperation with the Government

58:41 Prosecutorial Misconduct and Bias

01:04:43 The Complexity of Legal Defense

01:10:43 Concluding Thoughts and Future Discussions

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/695c2a43b1ddb8392c60352e695c2a43b1ddb8392c60352eMon, 05 Jan 2026 21:16:50 GMT<p>In this episode of 'Injustice for All,' host Robert Simels discusses the complexities and challenges of different types of cases, particularly white-collar crime, with guest attorney Jonathan Baum. Baum shares his varied professional background, from being a speechwriter for Bono and Bill Gates to becoming a criminal defense attorney. The conversation covers significant cases Baum was involved in, including the Mike Lynch fraud case and the OneTaste investigation. Baum provides insights into the disparities between defense and prosecution resources, the challenges of representing clients without significant funds, and the psychological pressures both clients and attorneys face in contentious legal battles. They also touch on issues of government overreach, the difficulties of habeas corpus petitions, and the often-oversimplified narrative of victimization in the legal system. The discussion emphasizes the importance of financial resources and nuanced advocacy in achieving justice.</p><br /><p>00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All</p><p>00:46 Understanding White Collar Crime</p><p>01:29 Challenges in Legal Defense</p><p>03:11 Introducing Jonathan Baum</p><p>04:14 Jonathan's Career Journey</p><p>07:24 The Role of Law Clerks</p><p>10:34 Habeas Corpus and Pro Se Clerks</p><p>16:28 The Reality of Prosecutors</p><p>20:02 The Mike Lynch Case</p><p>25:39 The OneTaste Case</p><p>36:57 The Backpage Prosecution</p><p>37:33 Backpage Prosecution Overview</p><p>38:39 Challenges of Defending Backpage</p><p>40:27 The Lynch Case: A Complex Defense</p><p>42:53 The Role of Testimony in Trials</p><p>48:36 The Reality of Plea Bargains</p><p>53:01 Cooperation with the Government</p><p>58:41 Prosecutorial Misconduct and Bias</p><p>01:04:43 The Complexity of Legal Defense</p><p>01:10:43 Concluding Thoughts and Future Discussions</p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no01:11:497Why Justice Fails - Corruption in the Courtroomfull<![CDATA[How Sentencing Really Works in the Criminal Justice System]]>In this episode of 'Injustice for All,' the host discusses the intricacies and flaws of the criminal justice system with Mark Allenbaugh, a sentencing and mitigation specialist. Mark explains the different components of the criminal justice process, emphasizing the significance of sentencing. He delves into the evolution and impact of the United States Sentencing Guidelines introduced in 1987, highlighting issues such as the decline in federal trial litigators and the effect of binding guidelines. Mark also discusses key concepts like downward departures, variances, restitution, and forfeiture, while critiquing the advisory nature of the guidelines post-2005. Additionally, they talk about the potential implications of the upcoming Ellenburg case on restitution and the importance of collateral attacks. The episode underscores the need for a more just and effective sentencing system and serves as an educational forum for understanding the complexities of federal sentencing.


00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All

00:24 Understanding the Criminal Justice System

01:03 The Impact of Sentencing Guidelines

02:08 The Decline of Federal Trials

05:50 The Role of Prosecutors

15:58 The Sentencing Commission and Its Influence

16:27 Mark Allenbaugh's Background and Role

20:37 The Evolution of Sentencing Guidelines

26:28 The Sentencing Table Explained

33:14 The Importance of Sentencing Data

38:22 Downward Departures and Variances

55:21 Intended Loss vs. Actual Loss in Sentencing

56:41 The Role of the Sentencing Commission

01:02:08 Restitution and Forfeiture Explained

01:11:21 Supreme Court Case: Ellenberg vs. United States

01:27:09 Open Pleas and Collateral Attacks

01:35:35 Federal Prison Guidebook and Conclusion

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/6974f97d79d88bc8ee721bc66974f97d79d88bc8ee721bc6Sat, 24 Jan 2026 16:55:25 GMT<p>In this episode of 'Injustice for All,' the host discusses the intricacies and flaws of the criminal justice system with Mark Allenbaugh, a sentencing and mitigation specialist. Mark explains the different components of the criminal justice process, emphasizing the significance of sentencing. He delves into the evolution and impact of the United States Sentencing Guidelines introduced in 1987, highlighting issues such as the decline in federal trial litigators and the effect of binding guidelines. Mark also discusses key concepts like downward departures, variances, restitution, and forfeiture, while critiquing the advisory nature of the guidelines post-2005. Additionally, they talk about the potential implications of the upcoming Ellenburg case on restitution and the importance of collateral attacks. The episode underscores the need for a more just and effective sentencing system and serves as an educational forum for understanding the complexities of federal sentencing.</p><br /><p>00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All</p><p>00:24 Understanding the Criminal Justice System</p><p>01:03 The Impact of Sentencing Guidelines</p><p>02:08 The Decline of Federal Trials</p><p>05:50 The Role of Prosecutors</p><p>15:58 The Sentencing Commission and Its Influence</p><p>16:27 Mark Allenbaugh's Background and Role</p><p>20:37 The Evolution of Sentencing Guidelines</p><p>26:28 The Sentencing Table Explained</p><p>33:14 The Importance of Sentencing Data</p><p>38:22 Downward Departures and Variances</p><p>55:21 Intended Loss vs. Actual Loss in Sentencing</p><p>56:41 The Role of the Sentencing Commission</p><p>01:02:08 Restitution and Forfeiture Explained</p><p>01:11:21 Supreme Court Case: Ellenberg vs. United States</p><p>01:27:09 Open Pleas and Collateral Attacks</p><p>01:35:35 Federal Prison Guidebook and Conclusion</p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no01:38:0311How Sentencing Really Works in the Criminal Justice Systemfull<![CDATA[How Corruption Shapes the Justice System Today]]>In the third episode of 'Injustice for All,' Robert Simels emphasizes the critical importance of selecting the right attorney for both civil and criminal cases, sharing personal experiences of inadequate representation. He highlights the persistent issue of corruption within the criminal justice system, referencing historical examples of governmental corruption and periodic investigations into these malpractices. Simels underscores the necessity of thorough preparation and communication between a client and their attorney to achieve a favorable outcome in court. He provides anecdotes from his own legal career to illustrate how diligent preparation can expose inconsistencies and manipulation, thereby securing victories in challenging cases. The episode concludes with a teaser for the next episode featuring Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, an expert on memory, who will further discuss issues pertinent to court testimonies and witness reliability.


00:00 The Importance of Choosing the Right Representation

00:35 Introduction to Episode Three

01:04 Corruption in the Criminal Justice System

03:52 Historical Investigations into Corruption

07:20 The Role of Special Prosecutors

12:36 The Challenge of Finding the Right Attorney

20:35 The Key to Winning: Preparation

25:10 Case Studies: The Importance of Thorough Preparation

34:58 Manipulation and Corruption in the System

38:53 The Role of Expert Witnesses

46:19 Conclusion and Next Week's Preview

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/69595b1e18c941d6d6108d3b69595b1e18c941d6d6108d3bSat, 03 Jan 2026 19:52:17 GMT<p>In the third episode of 'Injustice for All,' Robert Simels emphasizes the critical importance of selecting the right attorney for both civil and criminal cases, sharing personal experiences of inadequate representation. He highlights the persistent issue of corruption within the criminal justice system, referencing historical examples of governmental corruption and periodic investigations into these malpractices. Simels underscores the necessity of thorough preparation and communication between a client and their attorney to achieve a favorable outcome in court. He provides anecdotes from his own legal career to illustrate how diligent preparation can expose inconsistencies and manipulation, thereby securing victories in challenging cases. The episode concludes with a teaser for the next episode featuring Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, an expert on memory, who will further discuss issues pertinent to court testimonies and witness reliability.</p><br /><p>00:00 The Importance of Choosing the Right Representation</p><p>00:35 Introduction to Episode Three</p><p>01:04 Corruption in the Criminal Justice System</p><p>03:52 Historical Investigations into Corruption</p><p>07:20 The Role of Special Prosecutors</p><p>12:36 The Challenge of Finding the Right Attorney</p><p>20:35 The Key to Winning: Preparation</p><p>25:10 Case Studies: The Importance of Thorough Preparation</p><p>34:58 Manipulation and Corruption in the System</p><p>38:53 The Role of Expert Witnesses</p><p>46:19 Conclusion and Next Week's Preview</p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no00:47:193How Corruption Shapes the Justice System Todayfull<![CDATA[How Eyewitness Testimony Fails Justice]]>In this episode of 'Injustice for All,' the host interviews Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, a leading memory expert, about the reliability of eyewitness testimony. They discuss how memories can be easily manipulated by suggestions, misinformation, and other factors. Dr. Loftus explains her research on the 'misinformation effect,' where people's recollections of events can be altered, and shares instances of false memories, including the case of Steve Titus, who was wrongfully convicted due to faulty eyewitness identification. The conversation also covers historical cases like the McMartin preschool trial, where children were led to develop false memories of abuse. They explore how suggestive therapies can implant false memories and discuss the broader implications for the criminal justice system, emphasizing the need for awareness and better practices to prevent wrongful convictions.


00:00 Introduction to Episode 4: Memory and Justice

00:27 The Fragility of Memory in the Legal System

01:09 Perry Mason and the Reality of Courtroom Confessions

02:54 Manipulation of Witnesses: A Personal Anecdote

04:36 Introducing Dr. Elizabeth Loftus

05:50 The Misinformation Effect: How Memories are Contaminated

07:23 Case Study: The Tragic Story of Steve Titus

10:23 Planting False Memories: Experimental Insights

15:26 Therapeutic Suggestion and False Memories

17:57 The McMartin Preschool Case and Its Impact

22:00 The Power of Suggestion in Therapy

25:12 False Memories in Legal Testimonies

31:20 Prosecutors and the Malleability of Memory

33:25 The Broader Implications of False Memories

34:46 Conclusion: The Importance of Understanding Memory

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/69595bd26c77c8cb7acc63bc69595bd26c77c8cb7acc63bcSat, 03 Jan 2026 19:52:25 GMT<p>In this episode of 'Injustice for All,' the host interviews Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, a leading memory expert, about the reliability of eyewitness testimony. They discuss how memories can be easily manipulated by suggestions, misinformation, and other factors. Dr. Loftus explains her research on the 'misinformation effect,' where people's recollections of events can be altered, and shares instances of false memories, including the case of Steve Titus, who was wrongfully convicted due to faulty eyewitness identification. The conversation also covers historical cases like the McMartin preschool trial, where children were led to develop false memories of abuse. They explore how suggestive therapies can implant false memories and discuss the broader implications for the criminal justice system, emphasizing the need for awareness and better practices to prevent wrongful convictions.</p><br /><p>00:00 Introduction to Episode 4: Memory and Justice</p><p>00:27 The Fragility of Memory in the Legal System</p><p>01:09 Perry Mason and the Reality of Courtroom Confessions</p><p>02:54 Manipulation of Witnesses: A Personal Anecdote</p><p>04:36 Introducing Dr. Elizabeth Loftus</p><p>05:50 The Misinformation Effect: How Memories are Contaminated</p><p>07:23 Case Study: The Tragic Story of Steve Titus</p><p>10:23 Planting False Memories: Experimental Insights</p><p>15:26 Therapeutic Suggestion and False Memories</p><p>17:57 The McMartin Preschool Case and Its Impact</p><p>22:00 The Power of Suggestion in Therapy</p><p>25:12 False Memories in Legal Testimonies</p><p>31:20 Prosecutors and the Malleability of Memory</p><p>33:25 The Broader Implications of False Memories</p><p>34:46 Conclusion: The Importance of Understanding Memory</p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no00:37:474How Eyewitness Testimony Fails Justicefull<![CDATA[Secrets of the Justice System: Injustice For All]]>Robert Simels, with over 50 years of experience in the legal system, introduces his podcast 'Injustice for All.' Simels, who has served as a prosecutor, defense attorney, and inmate, promises to reveal the secrets and flaws of the justice system, highlighting how it often fails. He shares insights from his career, representing high-profile clients and his own experience of being targeted and imprisoned by the government. Sims discusses the systemic issues, the manipulation by law enforcement and judges, and the unspoken impact on families. He aims to provide an unfiltered truth through discussions with various guests, including legal experts, whistleblowers, and victims of injustice.


00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All

01:49 The Flaws in the Justice System

03:31 The Impact on Families

04:56 Manipulation in the Courtroom

06:56 Prosecutors and Their Agendas

07:33 Judges and Their Motivations

09:29 The Reality of Penalties

12:35 The Challenges of Reform

15:14 Personal Journey in Law

18:26 Early Career and Disillusionment

19:51 Special Prosecutor's Office

25:28 The Henry Hill Case

29:12 Becoming a Target

31:57 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/6959583b6446068fdc98e9916959583b6446068fdc98e991Sat, 03 Jan 2026 19:51:51 GMT<p>Robert Simels, with over 50 years of experience in the legal system, introduces his podcast 'Injustice for All.' Simels, who has served as a prosecutor, defense attorney, and inmate, promises to reveal the secrets and flaws of the justice system, highlighting how it often fails. He shares insights from his career, representing high-profile clients and his own experience of being targeted and imprisoned by the government. Sims discusses the systemic issues, the manipulation by law enforcement and judges, and the unspoken impact on families. He aims to provide an unfiltered truth through discussions with various guests, including legal experts, whistleblowers, and victims of injustice.</p><br /><p>00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All</p><p>01:49 The Flaws in the Justice System</p><p>03:31 The Impact on Families</p><p>04:56 Manipulation in the Courtroom</p><p>06:56 Prosecutors and Their Agendas</p><p>07:33 Judges and Their Motivations</p><p>09:29 The Reality of Penalties</p><p>12:35 The Challenges of Reform</p><p>15:14 Personal Journey in Law</p><p>18:26 Early Career and Disillusionment</p><p>19:51 Special Prosecutor's Office</p><p>25:28 The Henry Hill Case</p><p>29:12 Becoming a Target</p><p>31:57 Conclusion and Final Thoughts</p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no00:32:211Secrets of the Justice System: Injustice For Allfull<![CDATA[Understanding the Flaws in the Judicial System]]>The video script for 'Injustice for All' covers a range of issues related to the judicial system and the influence of the media on legal processes. It begins by discussing how settlements in legal cases are often pursued for reasons other than guilt, emphasizing the complexities and injustices of the criminal justice system. The host then introduces Juda Engelmayer, a public relations expert specializing in crisis management, to explore these themes further. Engelmayer describes his career in politics and crisis management, including his work with notable figures and his transition into public relations focusing on high-profile legal cases. The discussion includes several case studies where media narratives played a significant role in the legal outcomes, illustrating the power of the First Amendment. It highlights the controversial case of OneTaste and its founders, the prosecution of Carlos Watson, and the broader implications of media influence on jury pools and legal fairness. The episode underscores ongoing efforts to expose and correct judicial failings, advocating for the critical role of free speech in the justice system.


00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All

01:47 The Role of Defense Attorneys

02:53 Grand Jury Dynamics

04:06 Case Study: Washington DC Protests

07:13 The Importance of the First Amendment

07:41 Interview with Juda Engelmayer

12:54 Juda's Career Journey

19:25 Crisis Management and Public Relations

23:56 The Impact of Media on Legal Cases

32:48 Social Media vs Traditional Media

37:06 Justice System Focus: Current vs. Previous Administration

37:45 Case Study: Carlos Watson and Ozzy Media

39:59 Media Companies and Market Competition

41:04 Prosecution and Racial Bias

42:46 Public Relations and Legal Strategy

44:38 Cooperating Witnesses and Legal Deals

49:31 Case Study: Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz

53:51 Media Influence on Legal Proceedings

01:00:26 First Amendment and Judicial Bias



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/696533c188da0c07c195fc2b696533c188da0c07c195fc2bFri, 16 Jan 2026 07:00:00 GMT<p>The video script for 'Injustice for All' covers a range of issues related to the judicial system and the influence of the media on legal processes. It begins by discussing how settlements in legal cases are often pursued for reasons other than guilt, emphasizing the complexities and injustices of the criminal justice system. The host then introduces Juda Engelmayer, a public relations expert specializing in crisis management, to explore these themes further. Engelmayer describes his career in politics and crisis management, including his work with notable figures and his transition into public relations focusing on high-profile legal cases. The discussion includes several case studies where media narratives played a significant role in the legal outcomes, illustrating the power of the First Amendment. It highlights the controversial case of OneTaste and its founders, the prosecution of Carlos Watson, and the broader implications of media influence on jury pools and legal fairness. The episode underscores ongoing efforts to expose and correct judicial failings, advocating for the critical role of free speech in the justice system.</p><br /><p>00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All</p><p>01:47 The Role of Defense Attorneys</p><p>02:53 Grand Jury Dynamics</p><p>04:06 Case Study: Washington DC Protests</p><p>07:13 The Importance of the First Amendment</p><p>07:41 Interview with Juda Engelmayer</p><p>12:54 Juda's Career Journey</p><p>19:25 Crisis Management and Public Relations</p><p>23:56 The Impact of Media on Legal Cases</p><p>32:48 Social Media vs Traditional Media</p><p>37:06 Justice System Focus: Current vs. Previous Administration</p><p>37:45 Case Study: Carlos Watson and Ozzy Media</p><p>39:59 Media Companies and Market Competition</p><p>41:04 Prosecution and Racial Bias</p><p>42:46 Public Relations and Legal Strategy</p><p>44:38 Cooperating Witnesses and Legal Deals</p><p>49:31 Case Study: Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz</p><p>53:51 Media Influence on Legal Proceedings</p><p>01:00:26 First Amendment and Judicial Bias</p><br /><p><br /></p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no01:09:4210Understanding the Flaws in the Judicial Systemfull<![CDATA[Behind Bars: A Deep Dive into America's Prison System]]>Inside the Federal Bureau of Prisons: Leadership Turmoil, Sentencing Reality, and Why the System Fails


Host Robert Simels introduces “Injustice for All” and criticizes Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI head Patel for using personal attacks and avoiding answers in congressional hearings, including on the Epstein files, arguing this undermines public trust and transparency despite FOIA’s limits. Simels also cites politicized or flawed prosecutions (including an indictment of James Comey), a judge forced to resign in New Hampshire, and a ruling finding Alina Habba’s appointment as New Jersey U.S. Attorney illegal, potentially tainting cases. He then interviews prison expert Walter Pavlo, who explains BOP structure, security levels, DSCC designation and sentence computation, the decisive role of the PSR, and how public safety factors/management variables affect placement. Pavlo describes leadership turnover, staffing shortages, failing infrastructure, widespread cell phones, incomplete First Step Act/Second Chance Act implementation due to unchanged halfway-house capacity and limited programming, aging-inmate medical challenges, concerns about privatization, and his advocacy work and writing for Forbes.


02:14 Decorum and Bondi Hearing

04:38 Epstein Files and FOIA Limits

10:17 Politicized Prosecutions

15:37 System Failures and Bad Appointments

18:45 Introducing Walter Pavlo

21:06 What the BOP Does

22:46 The Federal Prison Guidebook

24:12 Prisonology and Mitigation Help

25:20 Security Levels Explained

27:13 Sentencing Strategy and Programs

29:51 PSR The Document That Rules

34:22 DSCC Designation and Computation

39:18 Public Safety and Management Variables

43:39 Working With DSCC to Fix Errors

44:38 Advocating to BOP

45:21 Director Turnover Explained

47:46 Budget Boost and Outlook

49:12 Union Loss and Staffing Crunch

51:14 Augmentation Non-Guard Roles

53:53 Case Managers and Counselors

55:08 Deputy Director Josh Smith

57:29 First Step Act Problems

59:22 Halfway Houses Bottleneck

01:02:13 Ineligible Crimes and Incentives

01:04:11 Facility Disrepair and Safety

01:06:25 Cell Phones and Contraband Economy

01:10:47 Aging and Medical Release Gaps

01:12:20 Private Prisons Debate

01:14:18 Why He Writes and CARES Act

01:17:05 Final Thoughts and Wrap Up

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/69a1a5e967ae12eb0a8987ab69a1a5e967ae12eb0a8987abTue, 03 Mar 2026 23:59:00 GMT<p>Inside the Federal Bureau of Prisons: Leadership Turmoil, Sentencing Reality, and Why the System Fails</p><br /><p>Host Robert Simels introduces “Injustice for All” and criticizes Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI head Patel for using personal attacks and avoiding answers in congressional hearings, including on the Epstein files, arguing this undermines public trust and transparency despite FOIA’s limits. Simels also cites politicized or flawed prosecutions (including an indictment of James Comey), a judge forced to resign in New Hampshire, and a ruling finding Alina Habba’s appointment as New Jersey U.S. Attorney illegal, potentially tainting cases. He then interviews prison expert Walter Pavlo, who explains BOP structure, security levels, DSCC designation and sentence computation, the decisive role of the PSR, and how public safety factors/management variables affect placement. Pavlo describes leadership turnover, staffing shortages, failing infrastructure, widespread cell phones, incomplete First Step Act/Second Chance Act implementation due to unchanged halfway-house capacity and limited programming, aging-inmate medical challenges, concerns about privatization, and his advocacy work and writing for Forbes.</p><br /><p>02:14 Decorum and Bondi Hearing</p><p>04:38 Epstein Files and FOIA Limits</p><p>10:17 Politicized Prosecutions</p><p>15:37 System Failures and Bad Appointments</p><p>18:45 Introducing Walter Pavlo</p><p>21:06 What the BOP Does</p><p>22:46 The Federal Prison Guidebook</p><p>24:12 Prisonology and Mitigation Help</p><p>25:20 Security Levels Explained</p><p>27:13 Sentencing Strategy and Programs</p><p>29:51 PSR The Document That Rules</p><p>34:22 DSCC Designation and Computation</p><p>39:18 Public Safety and Management Variables</p><p>43:39 Working With DSCC to Fix Errors</p><p>44:38 Advocating to BOP</p><p>45:21 Director Turnover Explained</p><p>47:46 Budget Boost and Outlook</p><p>49:12 Union Loss and Staffing Crunch</p><p>51:14 Augmentation Non-Guard Roles</p><p>53:53 Case Managers and Counselors</p><p>55:08 Deputy Director Josh Smith</p><p>57:29 First Step Act Problems</p><p>59:22 Halfway Houses Bottleneck</p><p>01:02:13 Ineligible Crimes and Incentives</p><p>01:04:11 Facility Disrepair and Safety</p><p>01:06:25 Cell Phones and Contraband Economy</p><p>01:10:47 Aging and Medical Release Gaps</p><p>01:12:20 Private Prisons Debate</p><p>01:14:18 Why He Writes and CARES Act</p><p>01:17:05 Final Thoughts and Wrap Up</p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no01:18:1215Behind Bars: A Deep Dive into America's Prison Systemfull<![CDATA[Witness and Evidence Manipulation]]>In this inaugural episode of 'Injustice for All,' host Robert Simels, a former prosecutor and defense attorney, delves into the failures and corruption within the American judicial system. Simels recounts his career, from prosecuting corrupt officials to his controversial representation of high-profile clients like Henry Hill and Donald Payton. He details his own legal battles, including being convicted in a case involving a DEA informant. The episode scrutinizes the manipulation by law enforcement and prosecutors in a recent case involving the organization OneTaste, where members were falsely accused of involuntary servitude. Featuring an interview with Alicia Price, a former OneTaste employee, the episode exposes how FBI agents coerced witnesses into portraying themselves as victims, underscoring systemic flaws and the pursuit of victories over justice.


00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All

00:46 Robert Simels' Career Journey

01:36 High-Profile Cases and Their Impact

03:45 The Turning Point: Government Retaliation

06:07 Manipulation in the Judicial System

09:46 Case Study: OneTaste Investigation

24:58 Alisha Price's Testimony

30:40 Facing the FBI: Initial Encounter

31:10 The Dread of Uncertainty

32:39 Intimidation Tactics

34:53 Seeking Legal Help

35:50 Victim Specialist Encounters

40:54 Breaking the Spell of Coercion

43:10 Writing the Letter

44:46 Trial and Testimonies

51:16 Systemic Corruption

53:26 Final Thoughts and Reflections

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/69595a80fcfcf09e558d668169595a80fcfcf09e558d6681Sat, 03 Jan 2026 19:52:07 GMT<p>In this inaugural episode of 'Injustice for All,' host Robert Simels, a former prosecutor and defense attorney, delves into the failures and corruption within the American judicial system. Simels recounts his career, from prosecuting corrupt officials to his controversial representation of high-profile clients like Henry Hill and Donald Payton. He details his own legal battles, including being convicted in a case involving a DEA informant. The episode scrutinizes the manipulation by law enforcement and prosecutors in a recent case involving the organization OneTaste, where members were falsely accused of involuntary servitude. Featuring an interview with Alicia Price, a former OneTaste employee, the episode exposes how FBI agents coerced witnesses into portraying themselves as victims, underscoring systemic flaws and the pursuit of victories over justice.</p><br /><p>00:00 Introduction to Injustice for All</p><p>00:46 Robert Simels' Career Journey</p><p>01:36 High-Profile Cases and Their Impact</p><p>03:45 The Turning Point: Government Retaliation</p><p>06:07 Manipulation in the Judicial System</p><p>09:46 Case Study: OneTaste Investigation</p><p>24:58 Alisha Price's Testimony</p><p>30:40 Facing the FBI: Initial Encounter</p><p>31:10 The Dread of Uncertainty</p><p>32:39 Intimidation Tactics</p><p>34:53 Seeking Legal Help</p><p>35:50 Victim Specialist Encounters</p><p>40:54 Breaking the Spell of Coercion</p><p>43:10 Writing the Letter</p><p>44:46 Trial and Testimonies</p><p>51:16 Systemic Corruption</p><p>53:26 Final Thoughts and Reflections</p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no00:56:452Witness and Evidence Manipulationfull<![CDATA[Ghislaine Maxwell, Mayor Adams, Rikers and NYC Corruption]]>In this episode of 'Injustice For All,' the host interviews Sarena Townsend, a former prosecutor and Inspector General for the New York City Department of Correction, who now practices privately. The discussion uncovers the failures and corruption within the NYC Department of Correction, particularly focusing on the numerous deaths at Rikers Island due to misconduct by guards. Townsend outlines the systemic mismanagement and challenges faced within the Department. The episode also highlights a recent set of lawsuits she filed accusing the NYC Police Department of corruption, detailing how political pressures and cronyism under Mayor Adams administration impact the policing and justice system. The latter half of the episode delves into Townsend's representation of four former NYPD chiefs who were retaliated against for whistleblowing. Issues like anti-crime units, excessive use of force, and the manipulation of the criminal justice system are examined in depth. The episode underscores a call for systemic change and increased public awareness.


00:00 Introduction and Episode Overview

02:00 Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein Scandal

05:50 Cooperation in the Criminal Justice System

10:58 Case Study: Charles Williams' Testimony

12:41 Department of Justice and Epstein's Grand Jury Testimony

18:07 Corruption in the New York City Police Department

27:48 Interview with Serena Townsend: Corruption in NYC Department of Correction

43:57 Challenges of Rikers Island Transportation

45:57 The Story Behind the Frank Bono Bridge

47:37 Staffing Issues and Mismanagement at Rikers

50:33 Sickouts and Accountability Measures

54:03 Federal Oversight and Receivership

01:05:09 Corruption in Mayor Adams' Inner Circle

01:06:17 Whistleblower Retaliation in NYPD

01:13:48 Conclusion and Future Topics

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/695c2718b1ddb8392c5eaa82695c2718b1ddb8392c5eaa82Mon, 05 Jan 2026 21:03:20 GMT<p>In this episode of 'Injustice For All,' the host interviews Sarena Townsend, a former prosecutor and Inspector General for the New York City Department of Correction, who now practices privately. The discussion uncovers the failures and corruption within the NYC Department of Correction, particularly focusing on the numerous deaths at Rikers Island due to misconduct by guards. Townsend outlines the systemic mismanagement and challenges faced within the Department. The episode also highlights a recent set of lawsuits she filed accusing the NYC Police Department of corruption, detailing how political pressures and cronyism under Mayor Adams administration impact the policing and justice system. The latter half of the episode delves into Townsend's representation of four former NYPD chiefs who were retaliated against for whistleblowing. Issues like anti-crime units, excessive use of force, and the manipulation of the criminal justice system are examined in depth. The episode underscores a call for systemic change and increased public awareness.</p><br /><p>00:00 Introduction and Episode Overview</p><p>02:00 Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein Scandal</p><p>05:50 Cooperation in the Criminal Justice System</p><p>10:58 Case Study: Charles Williams' Testimony</p><p>12:41 Department of Justice and Epstein's Grand Jury Testimony</p><p>18:07 Corruption in the New York City Police Department</p><p>27:48 Interview with Serena Townsend: Corruption in NYC Department of Correction</p><p>43:57 Challenges of Rikers Island Transportation</p><p>45:57 The Story Behind the Frank Bono Bridge</p><p>47:37 Staffing Issues and Mismanagement at Rikers</p><p>50:33 Sickouts and Accountability Measures</p><p>54:03 Federal Oversight and Receivership</p><p>01:05:09 Corruption in Mayor Adams' Inner Circle</p><p>01:06:17 Whistleblower Retaliation in NYPD</p><p>01:13:48 Conclusion and Future Topics</p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no01:14:285Ghislaine Maxwell, Mayor Adams, Rikers and NYC Corruptionfull<![CDATA[Beyond the Beats: The Untold Story of Murder Inc.]]>In this episode of 'Injustice For All,' host Robert Simels interviews his friend Chris Lorenzo, known to the public as Chris Gotti, co-founder of the music label Murder Inc. Alongside his brother Irv Gotti, Chris discusses their journey in building Murder Inc., which featured artists like Ashanti and Ja Rule. They delve into the federal prosecution they faced in the early 2000s due to alleged connections with narcotic trafficker Kenneth 'Supreme' McGriff. Throughout the interview, Chris explains the experience of being indicted, the impact on their business, and surviving the legal battle until their acquittal. Furthermore, the episode critiques the current and historical issues within the criminal justice system, highlighting cases of alleged judicial and governmental overreach. The discussion extends to Robert's analysis of the justice system's failings, recent legal controversies, and personal anecdotes from Chris about his business ventures post-Murder Inc., including ventures in sports management and filmmaking.


00:00 Introduction to the Podcast

00:25 Meet Chris Gotti: The Rise of Murder Inc.

01:41 The Week in Review: Justice System Critique

02:51 The Federal Indictments and Political Retribution

08:03 Challenges in the Criminal Justice System

10:40 The Case of the Sandwich Guy

14:00 Animal Rights Activism and Legal Battles

16:05 Chris Gotti's Early Life and Career Beginnings

17:59 Building Murder Inc.: From Humble Beginnings to Success

43:33 The Federal Investigation and Its Impact

48:42 The Murder Inc. Formula

49:45 Misunderstandings and Misinterpretations

52:24 Hiring Ex-Cons: A Positive Impact

56:34 The Kenneth Supreme McGriff Connection

01:00:39 Indictment and Legal Battles

01:15:26 Life After Murder Inc.

01:16:32 Current Ventures and Future Plans

01:28:45 Reflections and Closing Thoughts

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/6974fab170005a221c05ee806974fab170005a221c05ee80Fri, 30 Jan 2026 07:00:00 GMT<p>In this episode of 'Injustice For All,' host Robert Simels interviews his friend Chris Lorenzo, known to the public as Chris Gotti, co-founder of the music label Murder Inc. Alongside his brother Irv Gotti, Chris discusses their journey in building Murder Inc., which featured artists like Ashanti and Ja Rule. They delve into the federal prosecution they faced in the early 2000s due to alleged connections with narcotic trafficker Kenneth 'Supreme' McGriff. Throughout the interview, Chris explains the experience of being indicted, the impact on their business, and surviving the legal battle until their acquittal. Furthermore, the episode critiques the current and historical issues within the criminal justice system, highlighting cases of alleged judicial and governmental overreach. The discussion extends to Robert's analysis of the justice system's failings, recent legal controversies, and personal anecdotes from Chris about his business ventures post-Murder Inc., including ventures in sports management and filmmaking.</p><br /><p>00:00 Introduction to the Podcast</p><p>00:25 Meet Chris Gotti: The Rise of Murder Inc.</p><p>01:41 The Week in Review: Justice System Critique</p><p>02:51 The Federal Indictments and Political Retribution</p><p>08:03 Challenges in the Criminal Justice System</p><p>10:40 The Case of the Sandwich Guy</p><p>14:00 Animal Rights Activism and Legal Battles</p><p>16:05 Chris Gotti's Early Life and Career Beginnings</p><p>17:59 Building Murder Inc.: From Humble Beginnings to Success</p><p>43:33 The Federal Investigation and Its Impact</p><p>48:42 The Murder Inc. Formula</p><p>49:45 Misunderstandings and Misinterpretations</p><p>52:24 Hiring Ex-Cons: A Positive Impact</p><p>56:34 The Kenneth Supreme McGriff Connection</p><p>01:00:39 Indictment and Legal Battles</p><p>01:15:26 Life After Murder Inc.</p><p>01:16:32 Current Ventures and Future Plans</p><p>01:28:45 Reflections and Closing Thoughts</p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no01:30:3412Beyond the Beats: The Untold Story of Murder Inc.full<![CDATA[The Truth About Mamdani's Justice Reform Proposals]]>Host Robert Simels of “Injustice for All” addresses Mr. Mandami, saying his criminal justice reform proposals are unrealistic and offering to explain why. Simels emphasizes the importance of defense attorneys “testing” the system, citing John Adams defending British soldiers after the 1770 Boston incident as an example of rule of law over mob rule. He also points to the Fulton County, Georgia Trump election-interference case, describing how defense investigation revealed a conflict involving DA Fani Willis and a special prosecutor, leading the Georgia Supreme Court to disqualify Willis and her office and, in Simels’ view, effectively ending the case.


Simels then critiques political rhetoric and focuses on Manami’s NYC platform: closing Rikers Island by 2027, creating a billion-dollar Department of Community Safety with psychologists and social workers, cutting police overtime, taxing the wealthy, changing misdemeanor enforcement, and altering bail practices. Simels argues these plans overlook practical and legal constraints: federal litigation over Rikers before Judge Swain (SDNY) has led to contempt findings against the city and an order to appoint an independent remediation manager, which would limit mayoral control over the Department of Correction and potentially union rules. He describes Rikers as inhumane and dysfunctional, citing violence, poor medical care, suicides/deaths, officer disengagement, union protections, and massive spending. He questions whether borough-based jails will work, noting prior “house of detention” facilities did not function well.


On policing, Simels discusses stop-and-frisk litigation, the disbanding and relabeling of anti-crime units, CompStat under Bratton/Maples, and current officer behavior (e.g., phone use), arguing culture change across roughly 30,000 officers is difficult. He raises concerns about dispatching non-police responders to potentially dangerous incidents and challenges the feasibility of funding through taxing the rich, arguing wealthy taxpayers may avoid or leave. Simels says a mayor cannot change New York State bail statutes and also cannot direct independently elected district attorneys, who set their own policies, nor control federal law enforcement task forces. He disputes claims that large police-misconduct settlement figures can reliably be redirected to new initiatives, citing that 2024 payouts included older protest-related cases and other outliers.


Finally, Simels details how NYC criminal cases and jail-to-court logistics are slowed by multiple agencies and unions (police, corrections, court officers) and lengthy processing, often resulting in defendants spending a full day in transport/holding without appearing in court. He concludes by urging Manami to engage with the court and remediation manager, understand the system’s structure and constraints, and develop workable implementation plans.


00:00 Opening Challenge

01:22 Why Defense Matters

04:04 Fulton County Case Fallout

06:31 Politicians and Promises

07:46 Mandami Reform Agenda

10:33 Rikers Closure Plan

12:43 Federal Takeover Reality

17:42 Union Power at Rikers

20:17 Policing and Stop Frisk

24:24 Community Safety Problems

28:22 Misdemeanors and Discretion

31:28 Bail Limits and Authority

34:06 Excessive Force Myth

39:00 Terror and Diplomacy Limits

41:01 Mayors vs District Attorneys

45:13 How Cases Really Move

46:04 Court Transport Breakdown

50:48 Final Advice and Signoff


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/699d88d2f5c7a684d743967f699d88d2f5c7a684d743967fTue, 24 Feb 2026 23:59:00 GMT<p>Host Robert Simels of “Injustice for All” addresses Mr. Mandami, saying his criminal justice reform proposals are unrealistic and offering to explain why. Simels emphasizes the importance of defense attorneys “testing” the system, citing John Adams defending British soldiers after the 1770 Boston incident as an example of rule of law over mob rule. He also points to the Fulton County, Georgia Trump election-interference case, describing how defense investigation revealed a conflict involving DA Fani Willis and a special prosecutor, leading the Georgia Supreme Court to disqualify Willis and her office and, in Simels’ view, effectively ending the case.</p><br /><p>Simels then critiques political rhetoric and focuses on Manami’s NYC platform: closing Rikers Island by 2027, creating a billion-dollar Department of Community Safety with psychologists and social workers, cutting police overtime, taxing the wealthy, changing misdemeanor enforcement, and altering bail practices. Simels argues these plans overlook practical and legal constraints: federal litigation over Rikers before Judge Swain (SDNY) has led to contempt findings against the city and an order to appoint an independent remediation manager, which would limit mayoral control over the Department of Correction and potentially union rules. He describes Rikers as inhumane and dysfunctional, citing violence, poor medical care, suicides/deaths, officer disengagement, union protections, and massive spending. He questions whether borough-based jails will work, noting prior “house of detention” facilities did not function well.</p><br /><p>On policing, Simels discusses stop-and-frisk litigation, the disbanding and relabeling of anti-crime units, CompStat under Bratton/Maples, and current officer behavior (e.g., phone use), arguing culture change across roughly 30,000 officers is difficult. He raises concerns about dispatching non-police responders to potentially dangerous incidents and challenges the feasibility of funding through taxing the rich, arguing wealthy taxpayers may avoid or leave. Simels says a mayor cannot change New York State bail statutes and also cannot direct independently elected district attorneys, who set their own policies, nor control federal law enforcement task forces. He disputes claims that large police-misconduct settlement figures can reliably be redirected to new initiatives, citing that 2024 payouts included older protest-related cases and other outliers.</p><br /><p>Finally, Simels details how NYC criminal cases and jail-to-court logistics are slowed by multiple agencies and unions (police, corrections, court officers) and lengthy processing, often resulting in defendants spending a full day in transport/holding without appearing in court. He concludes by urging Manami to engage with the court and remediation manager, understand the system’s structure and constraints, and develop workable implementation plans.</p><br /><p>00:00 Opening Challenge</p><p>01:22 Why Defense Matters</p><p>04:04 Fulton County Case Fallout</p><p>06:31 Politicians and Promises</p><p>07:46 Mandami Reform Agenda</p><p>10:33 Rikers Closure Plan</p><p>12:43 Federal Takeover Reality</p><p>17:42 Union Power at Rikers</p><p>20:17 Policing and Stop Frisk</p><p>24:24 Community Safety Problems</p><p>28:22 Misdemeanors and Discretion</p><p>31:28 Bail Limits and Authority</p><p>34:06 Excessive Force Myth</p><p>39:00 Terror and Diplomacy Limits</p><p>41:01 Mayors vs District Attorneys</p><p>45:13 How Cases Really Move</p><p>46:04 Court Transport Breakdown</p><p>50:48 Final Advice and Signoff</p><p><br /></p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no00:51:2113The Truth About Mamdani's Justice Reform Proposalsfull<![CDATA[FBI Evidence Mishandling - The Truth Behind Major Case Failures]]>In this episode of 'Injustice for All,' the host discusses the importance of aggressive litigation in legal defense and prosecution, referencing past discussions like the Ghislaine Maxwell case. He introduces Rick Kiper, a former FBI agent and expert on the FBI's Computer Analysis Response Team (CART). Kiper discusses the role and procedures of CART, emphasizing the strict protocols for handling digital evidence to ensure integrity. The conversation shifts to specific cases, including the controversial handling of evidence in the Keith Ranieri case and the prosecution of Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz. Kiper details how mishandling by FBI agents, particularly failing to follow procedures like using right-blockers and maintaining the chain of custody, compromised the integrity of evidence. He also touches on the broader implications of these flaws for the criminal justice system, stressing the need for transparency and due process. The episode concludes with a teaser for future discussions on whistleblowing and modern surveillance technologies.


00:00 Introduction and Importance of Aggressiveness in Litigation

02:08 Updates on the Ghislaine Maxwell Case

04:57 Department of Justice Controversies

06:41 Introducing Rick Kiper: Former FBI Agent

07:38 Rick Kiper's Expertise and Role in the FBI

11:46 Understanding the FBI's CART Team

19:06 Chain of Custody and Evidence Handling

26:46 Case Study: US v. Keith Ranieri

43:15 Chain of Custody Issues in the Ranieri Case

44:14 Forensic Examiner's Testimony and Evidence Handling

45:29 Consequences for Agents' Procedural Failures

46:44 Defense's Efforts and Trial Judge's Response

47:51 Involvement of Alan Dershowitz and Further Case Analysis

48:14 Introduction to the Daedone and Cherwitz Case

49:10 Agent McGinnis' Role and Evidence Mishandling

50:37 Forensic Procedures and Evidence Handling Protocols

01:01:48 Agent Schmidt's Involvement and Further Mishandling

01:05:50 Speculations on Agents' Intentions

01:06:49 Conclusions on Evidence Handling in Daedone and Cherwitz Case

01:13:00 Confidential Human Sources and Informants

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/695c2b1629db57949e86f523695c2b1629db57949e86f523Mon, 05 Jan 2026 21:20:21 GMT<p>In this episode of 'Injustice for All,' the host discusses the importance of aggressive litigation in legal defense and prosecution, referencing past discussions like the Ghislaine Maxwell case. He introduces Rick Kiper, a former FBI agent and expert on the FBI's Computer Analysis Response Team (CART). Kiper discusses the role and procedures of CART, emphasizing the strict protocols for handling digital evidence to ensure integrity. The conversation shifts to specific cases, including the controversial handling of evidence in the Keith Ranieri case and the prosecution of Nicole Daedone and Rachel Cherwitz. Kiper details how mishandling by FBI agents, particularly failing to follow procedures like using right-blockers and maintaining the chain of custody, compromised the integrity of evidence. He also touches on the broader implications of these flaws for the criminal justice system, stressing the need for transparency and due process. The episode concludes with a teaser for future discussions on whistleblowing and modern surveillance technologies.</p><br /><p>00:00 Introduction and Importance of Aggressiveness in Litigation</p><p>02:08 Updates on the Ghislaine Maxwell Case</p><p>04:57 Department of Justice Controversies</p><p>06:41 Introducing Rick Kiper: Former FBI Agent</p><p>07:38 Rick Kiper's Expertise and Role in the FBI</p><p>11:46 Understanding the FBI's CART Team</p><p>19:06 Chain of Custody and Evidence Handling</p><p>26:46 Case Study: US v. Keith Ranieri</p><p>43:15 Chain of Custody Issues in the Ranieri Case</p><p>44:14 Forensic Examiner's Testimony and Evidence Handling</p><p>45:29 Consequences for Agents' Procedural Failures</p><p>46:44 Defense's Efforts and Trial Judge's Response</p><p>47:51 Involvement of Alan Dershowitz and Further Case Analysis</p><p>48:14 Introduction to the Daedone and Cherwitz Case</p><p>49:10 Agent McGinnis' Role and Evidence Mishandling</p><p>50:37 Forensic Procedures and Evidence Handling Protocols</p><p>01:01:48 Agent Schmidt's Involvement and Further Mishandling</p><p>01:05:50 Speculations on Agents' Intentions</p><p>01:06:49 Conclusions on Evidence Handling in Daedone and Cherwitz Case</p><p>01:13:00 Confidential Human Sources and Informants</p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no01:19:138FBI Evidence Mishandling - The Truth Behind Major Case Failuresfull<![CDATA[Behind the Scenes of Goodfellas: A Journey from Courtrooms to Hollywood]]>Goodfellas Anniversary, Prosecutorial Power, and Alleged Politicization of U.S. Justice


Host Robert Simels opens “Injustice for All” by marking the 35th anniversary of Goodfellas and recounting his role in events that led to the book and film. He describes being appointed in May 1980 to represent Henry Hill, learning Hill was a key link to the Lufthansa Airport robbery investigation, and negotiating Hill’s witness protection deal by demanding dismissal of Nassau County charges and no federal prosecution. He then explains how he and Hill agreed to split interest in Hill’s life story, how Simon & Schuster ultimately approved the project after initial rejection, how author Nicholas Pileggi was chosen with Hill’s approval, and how the book became a New York Times bestseller that led to the film deal involving director Martin Scorsese and producer Irwin Winkler.


Simels then shifts to broader themes about systemic corruption and prosecutorial power, stating the system is manipulated regardless of politics and previewing future episodes with guests from law enforcement and related fields. He discusses forum shopping in criminal and civil cases and cites examples involving social-issue litigation and President Trump’s New York Times lawsuit filed in Tampa, which a conservative judge dismissed as an improper “screed” and allowed to be refiled without biographical and political material.


Finally, Simels previews upcoming interviews with former FBI agents and criticizes FBI Director Kash Patel’s conduct in congressional hearings, alleged inexperience, restructuring of FBI leadership and counterintelligence, handling of a recent shooting investigation while dining at Rao’s, and alleged loyalty tests. He describes a lawsuit by former senior FBI officials Brian Driscoll, Steven Jensen, and Spencer Evans alleging firings tied to political loyalty and portraying Patel as executing White House and DOJ directives, including references to Stephen Miller. Sims closes by saying the series will continue examining how to restore the justice system’s integrity.


00:19 Goodfellas Anniversary Setup

00:54 Meeting Henry Hill

03:41 Negotiating Witness Deal

05:12 Nassau Breaks Agreement

08:09 Selling The Life Story

12:14 From Bestseller To Scorsese

13:08 Systemic Corruption Today

14:49 Forum Shopping Explained

17:38 Trump NYT Lawsuit Fiasco

21:54 DOJ As Personal Weapon

27:59 Targeting Schiff Bolton

30:01 Holman Sting Dropped

31:32 Presidential Prejudicing Comments

33:24 Removing Oversight Watchdogs

35:32 NYPD Misconduct Under Adams

40:30 Loyalty Tests And Lawsuit

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/699ee90ed15b2c2a1234f386699ee90ed15b2c2a1234f386Fri, 27 Feb 2026 23:59:00 GMT<p>Goodfellas Anniversary, Prosecutorial Power, and Alleged Politicization of U.S. Justice</p><br /><p>Host Robert Simels opens “Injustice for All” by marking the 35th anniversary of Goodfellas and recounting his role in events that led to the book and film. He describes being appointed in May 1980 to represent Henry Hill, learning Hill was a key link to the Lufthansa Airport robbery investigation, and negotiating Hill’s witness protection deal by demanding dismissal of Nassau County charges and no federal prosecution. He then explains how he and Hill agreed to split interest in Hill’s life story, how Simon &amp; Schuster ultimately approved the project after initial rejection, how author Nicholas Pileggi was chosen with Hill’s approval, and how the book became a New York Times bestseller that led to the film deal involving director Martin Scorsese and producer Irwin Winkler.</p><br /><p>Simels then shifts to broader themes about systemic corruption and prosecutorial power, stating the system is manipulated regardless of politics and previewing future episodes with guests from law enforcement and related fields. He discusses forum shopping in criminal and civil cases and cites examples involving social-issue litigation and President Trump’s New York Times lawsuit filed in Tampa, which a conservative judge dismissed as an improper “screed” and allowed to be refiled without biographical and political material. </p><br /><p>Finally, Simels previews upcoming interviews with former FBI agents and criticizes FBI Director Kash Patel’s conduct in congressional hearings, alleged inexperience, restructuring of FBI leadership and counterintelligence, handling of a recent shooting investigation while dining at Rao’s, and alleged loyalty tests. He describes a lawsuit by former senior FBI officials Brian Driscoll, Steven Jensen, and Spencer Evans alleging firings tied to political loyalty and portraying Patel as executing White House and DOJ directives, including references to Stephen Miller. Sims closes by saying the series will continue examining how to restore the justice system’s integrity.</p><br /><p>00:19 Goodfellas Anniversary Setup</p><p>00:54 Meeting Henry Hill</p><p>03:41 Negotiating Witness Deal</p><p>05:12 Nassau Breaks Agreement</p><p>08:09 Selling The Life Story</p><p>12:14 From Bestseller To Scorsese</p><p>13:08 Systemic Corruption Today</p><p>14:49 Forum Shopping Explained</p><p>17:38 Trump NYT Lawsuit Fiasco</p><p>21:54 DOJ As Personal Weapon</p><p>27:59 Targeting Schiff Bolton</p><p>30:01 Holman Sting Dropped</p><p>31:32 Presidential Prejudicing Comments</p><p>33:24 Removing Oversight Watchdogs</p><p>35:32 NYPD Misconduct Under Adams</p><p>40:30 Loyalty Tests And Lawsuit</p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no00:44:0314Behind the Scenes of Goodfellas: A Journey from Courtrooms to Hollywoodfull<![CDATA[Navigating Mental Health in the Criminal Justice System]]>Mental Disabilities in Criminal Defense and DOJ Appointment Controversies


Host Robert Simels introduces his background as former prosecutor, longtime defense attorney, and former inmate, then criticizes prosecutorial ethics and discusses legal challenges tied to Trump DOJ U.S. attorney appointments, including the Comey prosecution where U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan allegedly secured an indictment without a grand jury vote and related appointments-clause disputes likely headed to appellate courts. Simels then interviews New York-based defense attorney Elizabeth Kelley, who practices nationwide representing clients with serious mental illness, intellectual/developmental disabilities (including autism and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder), and neurocognitive disorders like dementia. Kelley explains the need for specialized forensic mental health evaluations to connect diagnosis to conduct for plea negotiations, sentencing mitigation, and competency issues; describes barriers to experts, court time, and BOP conditions; discusses autism’s impact on interrogation and testimony (citing an amicus brief in Sam Bankman-Fried’s case); and advocates humanizing clients and using preferred, person-first language.


00:47 Host Background And Mission

02:00 Comey Case Grand Jury Misstep

08:10 Appointments Clause Showdown

11:49 Meet Elizabeth Kelly

15:03 How Her Specialty Began

17:50 Building A Mental Health Defense

21:45 Finding And Funding Experts

26:52 Making Disability Matter In Court

31:54 Training Lawyers And Changing Culture

35:16 Time Pressures And Court Buy In

38:51 Do Prosecutors Cooperate

39:01 Prosecutors Start to Listen

42:58 CTE Claims Need Proof

45:19 Prisons as Mental Health Warehouses

48:35 Fixing Treatment Behind Bars

49:35 Danbury Special Skills Critique

53:39 Dementia Defense Playbook

58:00 Second Look and Expert Access

01:02:31 SBF Autism and Trial Strategy

01:07:23 Autism on the Witness Stand

01:13:32 Narrative Medicine for Lawyers

01:16:56 Person First Language Matters

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

]]>https://shows.acast.com/injustice-for-all-with-robert-simels/episodes/69a1bdf6f0bb26c2960fe48269a1bdf6f0bb26c2960fe482Thu, 05 Mar 2026 23:59:00 GMT<p>Mental Disabilities in Criminal Defense and DOJ Appointment Controversies</p><br /><p>Host Robert Simels introduces his background as former prosecutor, longtime defense attorney, and former inmate, then criticizes prosecutorial ethics and discusses legal challenges tied to Trump DOJ U.S. attorney appointments, including the Comey prosecution where U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan allegedly secured an indictment without a grand jury vote and related appointments-clause disputes likely headed to appellate courts. Simels then interviews New York-based defense attorney Elizabeth Kelley, who practices nationwide representing clients with serious mental illness, intellectual/developmental disabilities (including autism and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder), and neurocognitive disorders like dementia. Kelley explains the need for specialized forensic mental health evaluations to connect diagnosis to conduct for plea negotiations, sentencing mitigation, and competency issues; describes barriers to experts, court time, and BOP conditions; discusses autism’s impact on interrogation and testimony (citing an amicus brief in Sam Bankman-Fried’s case); and advocates humanizing clients and using preferred, person-first language.</p><br /><p>00:47 Host Background And Mission</p><p>02:00 Comey Case Grand Jury Misstep</p><p>08:10 Appointments Clause Showdown</p><p>11:49 Meet Elizabeth Kelly</p><p>15:03 How Her Specialty Began</p><p>17:50 Building A Mental Health Defense</p><p>21:45 Finding And Funding Experts</p><p>26:52 Making Disability Matter In Court</p><p>31:54 Training Lawyers And Changing Culture</p><p>35:16 Time Pressures And Court Buy In</p><p>38:51 Do Prosecutors Cooperate</p><p>39:01 Prosecutors Start to Listen</p><p>42:58 CTE Claims Need Proof</p><p>45:19 Prisons as Mental Health Warehouses</p><p>48:35 Fixing Treatment Behind Bars</p><p>49:35 Danbury Special Skills Critique</p><p>53:39 Dementia Defense Playbook</p><p>58:00 Second Look and Expert Access</p><p>01:02:31 SBF Autism and Trial Strategy</p><p>01:07:23 Autism on the Witness Stand</p><p>01:13:32 Narrative Medicine for Lawyers</p><p>01:16:56 Person First Language Matters</p><hr /><p> Hosted on Acast. See <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="https://acast.com/privacy" target="_blank">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>no01:20:1616Navigating Mental Health in the Criminal Justice Systemfull