<![CDATA[The United Patriots Alliance Show]]>Evan Mulch, Tactical Strategist for United Patriots Alliance, regularly hosts the show. Listeners will learn from expert patriots interviewed on the show.

The United Patriots Alliance is a South Carolina-focused, patriots organization that fights for the liberty of every American. UPA is committed to the preservation of every American’s God-given rights that are protected by our Constitution.

We demand that all elected officials honor their oaths and fulfill their obligations to preserve our inalienable rights as free men and women. UPA is committed to providing the most up-to-date and accurate news that we all need to preserve our God-given rights.

www.unitedpatriotsalliance.com

]]>https://www.unitedpatriotsalliance.comRiverside.fm (https://riverside.com)Sun, 15 Nov 2026 10:48:10 GMTMon, 05 Oct 2026 14:30:36 GMT60United Patriots Alliance<p>Evan Mulch, Tactical Strategist for United Patriots Alliance, regularly hosts the show. Listeners will learn from expert patriots interviewed on the show.<br /><br />The <b><strong>United Patriots Alliance</strong></b> is a South Carolina-focused, patriots organization that fights for the liberty of every American. UPA is committed to the preservation of every American’s God-given rights that are protected by our Constitution.</p><p>We demand that all elected officials honor their oaths and fulfill their obligations to preserve our inalienable rights as free men and women. UPA is committed to providing the most up-to-date and accurate news that we all need to preserve our God-given rights.<br /><br />www.unitedpatriotsalliance.com</p>episodicUnited Patriots Alliancecontact@unitedpatriotsalliance.comno<![CDATA[Vic Dabney Explains Why SC Republicans Rejected Darline]]>United Patriots Alliance host Evan Mulch speaks with Vic Dabney, a decorated military veteran and former South Carolina state representative. They discuss the grassroots write-in effort for Ralph Norman, voter frustration with the Senate race, party loyalty, and constitutional principles. Dabney also reflects on his military service and views on U.S. involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan, government spending, political influence, and South Carolina’s economic development incentives.

Timestamps
0:04 Introduction to Vic Dabney
1:00 The grassroots write-in effort and Republican voters skipping the Senate race
4:10 Trump’s opposition to Ralph Norman, as discussed by Dabney
7:08 Dabney’s military and political background
8:22 Party loyalty versus constitutional principles
10:11 Dabney’s concerns about the war with Iran
13:30 A visit to Senator Lindsey Graham’s office
16:03 Dabney’s views on the financial incentives behind wars
19:13 The write-in effort and the Republican Party
20:26 The Scout Motors incentive package
22:13 Political networks and public spending
24:04 Taxpayer support for universities
25:09 Dabney’s family and concern for future generations
26:19 Constitutional principles and the closing message

]]>b1b089a4-e8a2-4f51-b598-c4277eb933b4Thu, 05 Nov 2026 21:04:53 GMT<p>United Patriots Alliance host Evan Mulch speaks with Vic Dabney, a decorated military veteran and former South Carolina state representative. They discuss the grassroots write-in effort for Ralph Norman, voter frustration with the Senate race, party loyalty, and constitutional principles. Dabney also reflects on his military service and views on U.S. involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan, government spending, political influence, and South Carolina’s economic development incentives.<br /><br />Timestamps<br />0:04 Introduction to Vic Dabney<br />1:00 The grassroots write-in effort and Republican voters skipping the Senate race<br />4:10 Trump’s opposition to Ralph Norman, as discussed by Dabney<br />7:08 Dabney’s military and political background<br />8:22 Party loyalty versus constitutional principles<br />10:11 Dabney’s concerns about the war with Iran<br />13:30 A visit to Senator Lindsey Graham’s office<br />16:03 Dabney’s views on the financial incentives behind wars<br />19:13 The write-in effort and the Republican Party<br />20:26 The Scout Motors incentive package<br />22:13 Political networks and public spending<br />24:04 Taxpayer support for universities<br />25:09 Dabney’s family and concern for future generations<br />26:19 Constitutional principles and the closing message</p>no00:27:17Vic Dabney Explains Why SC Republicans Rejected Darlinefull<![CDATA[Theodora Scarato on the Hidden Health Costs of Data Centers and Cell Phone Towers]]>Description:
Are data centers, cell towers and high-voltage power lines being built too close to your home or your kids' school? Evan Mulch of United Patriots Alliance talks with Theodora Scarato of Environmental Health Sciences. She has worked on technology safety for about 15 years. They cover the environmental and health concerns she raises and what communities can do about them.

In This Episode:
-Why data centers bring air, land, water, noise and light issues together
-How data center cooling uses water, and what can happen to the water discharged afterward
-What she says about cell tower radiation and why the federal limits haven't changed since 1996
-Section 704 of the Telecom Act and why local officials can't weigh health in tower siting
-The push to override local control over towers and setbacks
-Opposition to high-voltage power lines in about 42 states
-Who funds the research and how that affects the results
-School districts, parent groups and health departments taking action
How to organize locally

Timestamps:
0:05 Introduction
1:11 How Theodora got into this work
2:58 Why data centers are "the whole package"
3:39 Water use and contamination concerns
8:11 Cell towers and children's health
9:21 Why the radiation limits are outdated
14:33 Section 704 and loss of local control
19:09 Data center opposition across the country
20:12 High-voltage power lines
26:12 Industry-funded vs. independent research
28:50 Good news: schools and communities responding
31:43 Tracking impacts, with the Pima County, Arizona example
35:27 Where to get involved
38:23 Local ordinances and state preemption
41:24 Closing thoughts

]]>c6ae4d3c-7206-4b41-b4ba-f8fd6e27c14dThu, 05 Nov 2026 16:26:04 GMT<p>Description:<br />Are data centers, cell towers and high-voltage power lines being built too close to your home or your kids' school? Evan Mulch of United Patriots Alliance talks with Theodora Scarato of Environmental Health Sciences. She has worked on technology safety for about 15 years. They cover the environmental and health concerns she raises and what communities can do about them.<br /><br />In This Episode:<br />-Why data centers bring air, land, water, noise and light issues together<br />-How data center cooling uses water, and what can happen to the water discharged afterward<br />-What she says about cell tower radiation and why the federal limits haven't changed since 1996<br />-Section 704 of the Telecom Act and why local officials can't weigh health in tower siting<br />-The push to override local control over towers and setbacks<br />-Opposition to high-voltage power lines in about 42 states<br />-Who funds the research and how that affects the results<br />-School districts, parent groups and health departments taking action<br />How to organize locally<br /><br />Timestamps:<br />0:05 Introduction<br />1:11 How Theodora got into this work<br />2:58 Why data centers are "the whole package"<br />3:39 Water use and contamination concerns<br />8:11 Cell towers and children's health<br />9:21 Why the radiation limits are outdated<br />14:33 Section 704 and loss of local control<br />19:09 Data center opposition across the country<br />20:12 High-voltage power lines<br />26:12 Industry-funded vs. independent research<br />28:50 Good news: schools and communities responding<br />31:43 Tracking impacts, with the Pima County, Arizona example<br />35:27 Where to get involved<br />38:23 Local ordinances and state preemption<br />41:24 Closing thoughts</p>no00:41:58Theodora Scarato on the Hidden Health Costs of Data Centers and Cell Phone Towersfull<![CDATA[From New York to South Carolina: An Educator's Warning to Parents]]>Description:
Evan Mulch of United Patriots Alliance talks with Kasey Grado, an educator, math teacher and homeschool parent now living in South Carolina. She grew up in New York City schools and later watched her children's schools in New Jersey dramatically decline. In this interview, she shares her personal story and her views on how federal grants, social-emotional learning (SEL) programs, school choice, and state education policy fit together.

In This Episode:
-Why Kasey moved her family from public school to private school, and then to homeschooling
-Her view of how federal pandemic-era funding (ESSER) helped bring SEL programs into districts
-Her concerns about New Jersey's health and sex-education learning standards
-Her claims about federal influence on state education through grants, data collection and Regional Educational Laboratories
-School accreditation, and why she thinks school choice and the Education Savings Trust Fund (ESTF) could bring more oversight to private schools
-Her objections to South Carolina's parental rights bill
-Her critique of SEL programs such as Leader in Me, and the 14-point list of concerns she reads from the Alliance to Protect Children
-Her views on test scores, lowered standards and teacher staffing
-Her argument that scholarship programs could shift costs to local taxpayers and the middle class
-Advice for parents and a closing call to stay informed and share what you learn

Timestamps:
0:01 Introduction
1:25 From NYC to NJ to SC: why Kasey left private school for homeschooling
1:53 ESSER funding and SEL comes to schools
4:10 Social promotion and holding a child back
7:55 New Jersey learning standards
9:16 Private school accreditation and Cognia
10:36 School choice and the ESTF
12:22 Why Kasey was fired from a private school job
14:00 Federal law on control of education, and how grants shape policy
15:50 The U.
S. Department of Education and the Institute of Education Sciences
18:34 Regional Educational Laboratories
22:25 Pre-K and parental rights
23:05 South Carolina's parental rights bill
24:42 The Southeast Regional Educational Laboratory and Anderson One
27:32 MTSS, PBIS and the "whole student" approach
33:06 Rebranded programs, portraits of a graduate and grant renewals
37:51 Testing, MAP Growth and Khan Academy
40:14 Leader in Me, Franklin Covey and unconscious bias
42:32 The Speed of Trust program
52:35 Character education laws and the American Rescue Plan
53:31 The federal mental health strategy and the CDC's WSCC model
57:04 Test scores, standards and teacher staffing
1:00:43 Education savings accounts and Bob Jones University
1:04:59 What parents can do
1:06:49 What school choice could mean for local taxpayers
1:09:18 District consolidation and local control
1:12:02 Universal school choice bills and tax credits
1:16:07 Reading the Alliance to Protect Children's list of SEL concerns
1:23:50 Closing thoughts
1:29:48 Thank you and sign-off

]]>https://unitedpatriotsalliance.substack.com/920da09d-26f2-47cc-93f5-e0075ed24ba1Tue, 03 Nov 2026 15:12:05 GMT<p>Description:<br />Evan Mulch of United Patriots Alliance talks with Kasey Grado, an educator, math teacher and homeschool parent now living in South Carolina. She grew up in New York City schools and later watched her children's schools in New Jersey dramatically decline. In this interview, she shares her personal story and her views on how federal grants, social-emotional learning (SEL) programs, school choice, and state education policy fit together. <br /><br />In This Episode:<br />-Why Kasey moved her family from public school to private school, and then to homeschooling<br />-Her view of how federal pandemic-era funding (ESSER) helped bring SEL programs into districts<br />-Her concerns about New Jersey's health and sex-education learning standards<br />-Her claims about federal influence on state education through grants, data collection and Regional Educational Laboratories<br />-School accreditation, and why she thinks school choice and the Education Savings Trust Fund (ESTF) could bring more oversight to private schools<br />-Her objections to South Carolina's parental rights bill<br />-Her critique of SEL programs such as Leader in Me, and the 14-point list of concerns she reads from the Alliance to Protect Children<br />-Her views on test scores, lowered standards and teacher staffing<br />-Her argument that scholarship programs could shift costs to local taxpayers and the middle class<br />-Advice for parents and a closing call to stay informed and share what you learn<br /><br />Timestamps:<br />0:01 Introduction<br />1:25 From NYC to NJ to SC: why Kasey left private school for homeschooling<br />1:53 ESSER funding and SEL comes to schools<br />4:10 Social promotion and holding a child back<br />7:55 New Jersey learning standards<br />9:16 Private school accreditation and Cognia<br />10:36 School choice and the ESTF<br />12:22 Why Kasey was fired from a private school job<br />14:00 Federal law on control of education, and how grants shape policy<br />15:50 The U.<br />S. Department of Education and the Institute of Education Sciences<br />18:34 Regional Educational Laboratories<br />22:25 Pre-K and parental rights<br />23:05 South Carolina's parental rights bill<br />24:42 The Southeast Regional Educational Laboratory and Anderson One<br />27:32 MTSS, PBIS and the "whole student" approach<br />33:06 Rebranded programs, portraits of a graduate and grant renewals<br />37:51 Testing, MAP Growth and Khan Academy<br />40:14 Leader in Me, Franklin Covey and unconscious bias<br />42:32 The Speed of Trust program<br />52:35 Character education laws and the American Rescue Plan<br />53:31 The federal mental health strategy and the CDC's WSCC model<br />57:04 Test scores, standards and teacher staffing<br />1:00:43 Education savings accounts and Bob Jones University<br />1:04:59 What parents can do<br />1:06:49 What school choice could mean for local taxpayers<br />1:09:18 District consolidation and local control<br />1:12:02 Universal school choice bills and tax credits<br />1:16:07 Reading the Alliance to Protect Children's list of SEL concerns<br />1:23:50 Closing thoughts<br />1:29:48 Thank you and sign-off</p>no01:30:00From New York to South Carolina: An Educator's Warning to Parentsfull<![CDATA[South Carolina GOP Is Being Run Like a Crime Syndicate]]>South Carolina Republican politics is being run like a machine, and Barry Sanders says the fix starts with exposing who’s really in charge. In this sharp, inside-baseball conversation, Sanders - chairman of the Oconee County Republicans - explains why the fight for the state party has turned into a battle over transparency, ethics, and whether grassroots conservatives will ever get a real seat at the table.

Evan Mulch and Barry Sanders break down the state GOP’s internal civil war, the pressure on county chairs to fall in line, and the growing backlash against what they describe as the paid political class. Sanders lays out why the proposed South Carolina Political Party Transparency and Ethics Reform Bill matters, how dark money and consulting ties can distort elections, and why closed primaries and party rules are fueling distrust instead of unity.

You’ll hear:

Why Oconee County became a flashpoint in the struggle between establishment Republicans and constitutional conservatives

How Sanders and other county leaders are trying to rebuild the party from the ground up

Why the ethics reform bill could force party leaders to disclose lobbying, consulting, and donation commissions

What Sanders says happened when conservatives were pushed out, ignored, or shouted down

Why the current system is driving voters toward write-ins, third-party options, and outright apathy

This episode also digs into the fallout from high-stakes Senate politics, the damage caused when party leadership weaponizes rules instead of building trust, and the deeper question hanging over South Carolina: can a state party recover once its own voters stop believing it plays fair?

Essential listening if you care about election integrity, conservative grassroots politics, and the future of the South Carolina Republican Party. If you want to understand why so many activists think the system is rigged from the inside, this conversation pulls back the curtain.

]]>https://unitedpatriotsalliance.substack.com/95042ceb-c269-4518-bc3d-fc71b95cbb86Wed, 21 Oct 2026 16:24:21 GMT<p>South Carolina Republican politics is being run like a machine, and Barry Sanders says the fix starts with exposing who’s really in charge. In this sharp, inside-baseball conversation, Sanders - chairman of the Oconee County Republicans - explains why the fight for the state party has turned into a battle over transparency, ethics, and whether grassroots conservatives will ever get a real seat at the table.<br /><br />Evan Mulch and Barry Sanders break down the state GOP’s internal civil war, the pressure on county chairs to fall in line, and the growing backlash against what they describe as the paid political class. Sanders lays out why the proposed South Carolina Political Party Transparency and Ethics Reform Bill matters, how dark money and consulting ties can distort elections, and why closed primaries and party rules are fueling distrust instead of unity.<br /><br />You’ll hear:<br /><br />Why Oconee County became a flashpoint in the struggle between establishment Republicans and constitutional conservatives<br /><br />How Sanders and other county leaders are trying to rebuild the party from the ground up<br /><br />Why the ethics reform bill could force party leaders to disclose lobbying, consulting, and donation commissions<br /><br />What Sanders says happened when conservatives were pushed out, ignored, or shouted down<br /><br />Why the current system is driving voters toward write-ins, third-party options, and outright apathy<br /><br />This episode also digs into the fallout from high-stakes Senate politics, the damage caused when party leadership weaponizes rules instead of building trust, and the deeper question hanging over South Carolina: can a state party recover once its own voters stop believing it plays fair?<br /><br />Essential listening if you care about election integrity, conservative grassroots politics, and the future of the South Carolina Republican Party. If you want to understand why so many activists think the system is rigged from the inside, this conversation pulls back the curtain.</p>no00:43:10South Carolina GOP Is Being Run Like a Crime Syndicatefull<![CDATA[The Politically Weaponized Labeling Strategy: Turning Conservatives Into "Extremists"]]>To help stop the political weaponization of labels, please let others know that you publicly stand against racial supremacy. To do this, you are encouraged to publicly sign the Reject All Racial Supremacy pledge, as both Zoe Warren and Evan Mulch have: https://www.rejectallracialsupremacy.com/

In this episode of the United Patriots Alliance Show, we dive deep into the implications of hate speech laws and their impact on free speech. Join Evan Mulch and Zoe Warren as they discuss how labels are weaponized politically and the dangers of government overreach.

Key takeaways:

* Understanding hate speech laws and their connection to the First Amendment.
* The role of the federal government in labeling individuals and groups.
* How hate crime laws can be used to marginalize political opponents.
* The importance of knowing your rights in the face of government scrutiny.

]]>https://unitedpatriotsalliance.substack.com/61548cfc-84e0-4de9-8d33-a696c7008e68Thu, 15 Oct 2026 19:23:38 GMT<p>To help stop the political weaponization of labels, please let others know that you publicly stand against racial supremacy. To do this, you are encouraged to publicly sign the Reject All Racial Supremacy pledge, as both Zoe Warren and Evan Mulch have: <a href="https://www.rejectallracialsupremacy.com/" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://www.rejectallracialsupremacy.com/</a><br /><br />In this episode of the United Patriots Alliance Show, we dive deep into the implications of hate speech laws and their impact on free speech. Join Evan Mulch and Zoe Warren as they discuss how labels are weaponized politically and the dangers of government overreach.<br /><br />Key takeaways:<br /><br />* Understanding hate speech laws and their connection to the First Amendment.<br />* The role of the federal government in labeling individuals and groups.<br />* How hate crime laws can be used to marginalize political opponents.<br />* The importance of knowing your rights in the face of government scrutiny.<br /></p>yes00:46:373The Politically Weaponized Labeling Strategy: Turning Conservatives Into "Extremists"full<![CDATA[Inside South Carolina GOP Corruption, Defiance, and the Fight for Liberty with Guest Bob Fetterly]]>Evan Mulch talks with Bob Fetterly, former chairman of the Pickens County Republican Party in South Carolina, about why he believes the GOP has drifted far from its stated platform and why “unity” without accountability is meaningless. The conversation broadens into federal debt, central banking, foreign policy, and the constitutional limits on government power. Bob argues that both state and federal politics are built to keep voters hopeful while delivering the same outcomes, and he lays out a strategy to break up entrenched corruption and rebuild from the county level up.

]]>b9ff2b8c-3ca2-4453-92db-935977eacfd0Wed, 07 Oct 2026 15:09:56 GMT<p>Evan Mulch talks with Bob Fetterly, former chairman of the Pickens County Republican Party in South Carolina, about why he believes the GOP has drifted far from its stated platform and why “unity” without accountability is meaningless. The conversation broadens into federal debt, central banking, foreign policy, and the constitutional limits on government power. Bob argues that both state and federal politics are built to keep voters hopeful while delivering the same outcomes, and he lays out a strategy to break up entrenched corruption and rebuild from the county level up.</p>no00:41:062Inside South Carolina GOP Corruption, Defiance, and the Fight for Liberty with Guest Bob Fetterlyfull<![CDATA[From Liberty to Leviathan: The Rise Of The Administrative State]]>The conversation explores the concept of the administrative state, its origins, and its impact on local and state governance, particularly in the context of Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. Matthew Rhodes discusses the historical progression of government control and the shift from self-governance to dependency on federal systems, emphasizing the need for a return to representative government. The conversation delves into the complexities of local governance, funding, and the implications of federal grants on community autonomy. Rhodes discusses the shift from representative government to administrative control, emphasizing the need for citizens to reclaim their sovereignty and question the authority of local officials.


Takeaways

  • Understanding the administrative state
  • Historical roots of government control Local governance complexities
  • Need for community sovereignty


Chapters

  • 00:00 Introduction to the Administrative State
  • 03:00 Historical Context of Government Control
  • 05:47 The Role of Progressivism in Governance
  • 12:02 The New Deal and Administrative Procedures
  • 17:55 Dependency and Consumerism in Modern Governance
  • 21:05 Marble Cake Federalism Explained
  • 25:10 The Northern Border Regional Commission and Local Governance
  • 27:34 Understanding Local Development Districts
  • 30:39 The Impact of Federal Funding
  • 36:27 The Shift from Self-Reliance to Dependency
  • 40:00 Statute Law vs. Constitutional Authority
  • 49:56 Identifying Unelected Officials and Their Power
]]>ceacb1ff-ed08-4a40-a798-0bce2d990261Mon, 05 Oct 2026 15:41:17 GMT<p>The conversation explores the concept of the administrative state, its origins, and its impact on local and state governance, particularly in the context of Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. Matthew Rhodes discusses the historical progression of government control and the shift from self-governance to dependency on federal systems, emphasizing the need for a return to representative government. The conversation delves into the complexities of local governance, funding, and the implications of federal grants on community autonomy. Rhodes discusses the shift from representative government to administrative control, emphasizing the need for citizens to reclaim their sovereignty and question the authority of local officials.</p><p><br /></p><p>Takeaways</p><ul><li>Understanding the administrative state</li><li>Historical roots of government control Local governance complexities</li><li>Need for community sovereignty</li></ul><p><br /></p><p>Chapters</p><ul><li>00:00 Introduction to the Administrative State</li><li>03:00 Historical Context of Government Control</li><li>05:47 The Role of Progressivism in Governance</li><li>12:02 The New Deal and Administrative Procedures</li><li>17:55 Dependency and Consumerism in Modern Governance</li><li>21:05 Marble Cake Federalism Explained</li><li>25:10 The Northern Border Regional Commission and Local Governance</li><li>27:34 Understanding Local Development Districts</li><li>30:39 The Impact of Federal Funding</li><li>36:27 The Shift from Self-Reliance to Dependency</li><li>40:00 Statute Law vs. Constitutional Authority</li><li>49:56 Identifying Unelected Officials and Their Power</li></ul>no00:53:02From Liberty to Leviathan: The Rise Of The Administrative Statefull