<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:psc="http://podlove.org/simple-chapters" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Fiercely Independent]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><b>Fiercely Independent is where politics, media, and culture get stripped of the performance. Hosted with a direct, independent voice, the show challenges partisan scripts, calls out hypocrisy on all sides, and breaks down the stories shaping America without asking you to pick a team.</b></p><p></p><p><b>For listeners tired of fake outrage, soft interviews, and recycled talking points, Fiercely Independent delivers sharp analysis, honest debate, and a clear point of view built for people who still think for themselves.</b></p>]]></description><link>https://fiercelyindependent.org/</link><generator>Riverside.fm (https://riverside.com)</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 13:38:00 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://api.riverside.com/hosting/ZxQf3djk.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><author><![CDATA[Chris]]></author><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 15:58:10 GMT</pubDate><copyright><![CDATA[2026 Chris]]></copyright><language><![CDATA[en]]></language><ttl>60</ttl><category><![CDATA[News Commentary]]></category><category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category><itunes:author>Chris</itunes:author><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Fiercely Independent is where politics, media, and culture get stripped of the performance. Hosted with a direct, independent voice, the show challenges partisan scripts, calls out hypocrisy on all sides, and breaks down the stories shaping America without asking you to pick a team.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;For listeners tired of fake outrage, soft interviews, and recycled talking points, Fiercely Independent delivers sharp analysis, honest debate, and a clear point of view built for people who still think for themselves.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type><itunes:owner><itunes:name>Chris</itunes:name><itunes:email>r.christophermckie@gmail.com</itunes:email></itunes:owner><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:category text="News"><itunes:category text="News Commentary"/><itunes:category text="Politics"/></itunes:category><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><item><title><![CDATA[This $2 Billion AI Data Center Creates Just 50 Jobs]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A $2 billion Amazon data center is consuming 56 acres of Gilroy farmland and demanding nearly 100 megawatts of electrical capacity. The promised payoff? About 50 permanent jobs.</p><p>White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett says data centers bring investment, jobs, and happy residents. But many Gilroy residents say they never got a vote and did not realize what was coming until construction had already begun.</p><p>When a massive AI project strains local land, electricity, and water, shouldn’t the community have a say before the bulldozers arrive?</p><p>This is <b>This Week’s Worst</b> from Fiercely Independent.</p><p><b>Stay fair. Stay independent.</b></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">34a0ed41-1276-446a-830f-0dec9675fd04</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2026 15:35:01 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/0714f9963ec56077e9feda0a0cf8c819224c2a27ae656979d28b38cfee8e894a/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIzNGEwZWQ0MS0xMjc2LTQ0NmEtODMwZi0wZGVjOTY3NWZkMDQiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE4OWMxMTcxYjRlODE4OTQ2MTFhY2NhL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi04LTIyX18xNy0zMi0zOS5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5128507" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/34a0ed41-1276-446a-830f-0dec9675fd04/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;A $2 billion Amazon data center is consuming 56 acres of Gilroy farmland and demanding nearly 100 megawatts of electrical capacity. The promised payoff? About 50 permanent jobs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett says data centers bring investment, jobs, and happy residents. But many Gilroy residents say they never got a vote and did not realize what was coming until construction had already begun.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When a massive AI project strains local land, electricity, and water, shouldn’t the community have a say before the bulldozers arrive?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is &lt;b&gt;This Week’s Worst&lt;/b&gt; from Fiercely Independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Stay fair. Stay independent.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:40</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>This $2 Billion AI Data Center Creates Just 50 Jobs</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[America Hit $40 Trillion in Debt. You’re Getting the Bill.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The national debt has crossed $40 trillion, roughly $117,000 for every person in America. Washington now spends around $1 trillion a year just paying interest on money it already borrowed.</p><p>Republicans blame Democrats. Democrats blame Republicans. But the debt has exploded under both parties, and the politicians responsible will not be the ones stuck with the bill.</p><p>So who pays for it? You, your children, and the generations that follow.</p><p><b>Think freely. Question everything.</b></p><p>#NationalDebt #40Trillion #GovernmentSpending #Trump #Biden #Politics #USPolitics #FiercelyIndependent</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">be43118f-5488-4eea-9a81-74942aa17995</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2026 18:25:24 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/4876740def1966bb1b850706fb3355775475467adb432667b482875c40937740/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJiZTQzMTE4Zi01NDg4LTRlZWEtOWE4MS03NDk0MmFhMTc5OTUiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE4NzQ0OGFhNTc2ZTYzOTQzZGIyNzFhL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi04LTIwX18yMC0xNi00Mi5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5638417" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/be43118f-5488-4eea-9a81-74942aa17995/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;The national debt has crossed $40 trillion, roughly $117,000 for every person in America. Washington now spends around $1 trillion a year just paying interest on money it already borrowed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Republicans blame Democrats. Democrats blame Republicans. But the debt has exploded under both parties, and the politicians responsible will not be the ones stuck with the bill.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So who pays for it? You, your children, and the generations that follow.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Think freely. Question everything.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#NationalDebt #40Trillion #GovernmentSpending #Trump #Biden #Politics #USPolitics #FiercelyIndependent&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:56</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>America Hit $40 Trillion in Debt. You’re Getting the Bill.</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Police STOP You From Recording Them? A Federal Court Just Answered]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Can police order you to stop recording them? Can ICE agents? What about government employees, city councils, or officers outside a police station?</p><p>A major federal appeals court ruling just clarified how the <b>First Amendment protects your right to record government officials in public</b>, and where that protection ends.</p><p>In this episode of Fiercely Independent, Chris breaks down:</p><ul><li>When you can legally record police</li><li>Whether ICE agents can stop you from filming</li><li>Why being on a public sidewalk matters</li><li>The difference between recording and interfering</li><li>When government buildings can restrict cameras</li><li>Why qualified immunity mattered in this case</li><li>Why you do <b>not</b> need a press badge to exercise First Amendment rights</li></ul><p>Your phone may be one of the most powerful accountability tools you carry. But hitting record does not give you unlimited rights.</p><p><b>Know where the line actually is.</b></p><p>Stay Fierce. Stay Independent.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">02b52db3-f3e3-41d9-8dde-31c5dbec0e35</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 17:52:43 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/930b553c12130b8f796c2d516b34fe13b6308c3f974ce40fc305d9e816d9818d/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIwMmI1MmRiMy1mM2UzLTQxZDktOGRkZS0zMWM1ZGJlYzBlMzUiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE4NWVjYTYxN2ZjZGY1N2ZmYWY4ZjdmL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi04LTE5X18xOS00OS0yNi5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="22858335" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/02b52db3-f3e3-41d9-8dde-31c5dbec0e35/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Can police order you to stop recording them? Can ICE agents? What about government employees, city councils, or officers outside a police station?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A major federal appeals court ruling just clarified how the &lt;b&gt;First Amendment protects your right to record government officials in public&lt;/b&gt;, and where that protection ends.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this episode of Fiercely Independent, Chris breaks down:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;When you can legally record police&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Whether ICE agents can stop you from filming&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Why being on a public sidewalk matters&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The difference between recording and interfering&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;When government buildings can restrict cameras&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Why qualified immunity mattered in this case&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Why you do &lt;b&gt;not&lt;/b&gt; need a press badge to exercise First Amendment rights&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your phone may be one of the most powerful accountability tools you carry. But hitting record does not give you unlimited rights.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Know where the line actually is.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay Fierce. Stay Independent.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:11:54</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Can Police STOP You From Recording Them? A Federal Court Just Answered</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump’s $10 Billion BBC Lawsuit Just Got Awkward]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The BBC screwed up.</p><p>In a documentary about January 6, it spliced together different parts of Donald Trump’s speech in a way that created a misleading impression. The BBC apologized. Trump sued.</p><p>Then he demanded <b>$10 billion in damages</b>.</p><p>That’s where the story gets much more interesting.</p><p>Because once you put a $10 billion price tag on reputational harm, you don’t just get to say you were wronged. You have to show the damage. What did you lose? What changed? And how does it add up to $10 billion?</p><p>Trump wanted the BBC held accountable for what it did. Now the legal process may require him to prove exactly what the BBC did to him.</p><p><b>Accountability works both ways.</b></p><p></p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">cc00a745-9f9d-47b6-908d-18943dececd5</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 16:56:13 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/6bcd4b8a181000d37fdf414e7d837be6f2293a67a3808be683dfcbfe0f98aa2e/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJjYzAwYTc0NS05ZjlkLTQ3YjYtOTA4ZC0xODk0M2RlY2VjZDUiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE4NDhlMGMwOWQ0Y2MxN2NhMDBlMmMxL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi04LTE4X18xOC01My0zMi5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5157764" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/cc00a745-9f9d-47b6-908d-18943dececd5/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;The BBC screwed up.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a documentary about January 6, it spliced together different parts of Donald Trump’s speech in a way that created a misleading impression. The BBC apologized. Trump sued.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then he demanded &lt;b&gt;$10 billion in damages&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That’s where the story gets much more interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Because once you put a $10 billion price tag on reputational harm, you don’t just get to say you were wronged. You have to show the damage. What did you lose? What changed? And how does it add up to $10 billion?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Trump wanted the BBC held accountable for what it did. Now the legal process may require him to prove exactly what the BBC did to him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Accountability works both ways.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:41</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Trump’s $10 Billion BBC Lawsuit Just Got Awkward</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Easiest Argument to Win? One Nobody Made]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>What’s the easiest argument to win? One your opponent never actually made.</p><p>It’s called the <b>straw man fallacy</b>, and once you know what to look for, you’ll start noticing it everywhere.</p><p>In this week’s <b>Spot the Spin</b>, Chris breaks down how an argument can be subtly changed into something more extreme, more outrageous, and much easier to attack.</p><p>Using real examples from political debate and cable news, we look at the difference between challenging what someone actually said and attacking a position they never held.</p><p>The next time you hear an argument that sounds almost <i>too</i> easy to knock down, ask:</p><p>What did the person actually say?<br />Is that what’s being challenged?<br />Or has their position been replaced with something easier to attack?</p><p>Because when we start debating positions nobody actually holds, the real argument disappears.</p><p><b>Think Freely. Question Everything.</b></p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">655b681d-1a1c-406f-a8af-f8eb77fcbb05</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 16:55:26 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/ae8c4c23d8bded5ebc74972bec8fd7dbecfb001818e1b63b1ab8877cb9199a72/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI2NTViNjgxZC0xYTFjLTQwNmYtYThhZi1mOGViNzdmY2JiMDUiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE4MzNjNjNjMWNkMzExZDdiOWZhNWYwL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi04LTE3X18xOC01Mi01MC5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5218786" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/655b681d-1a1c-406f-a8af-f8eb77fcbb05/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;What’s the easiest argument to win? One your opponent never actually made.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It’s called the &lt;b&gt;straw man fallacy&lt;/b&gt;, and once you know what to look for, you’ll start noticing it everywhere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this week’s &lt;b&gt;Spot the Spin&lt;/b&gt;, Chris breaks down how an argument can be subtly changed into something more extreme, more outrageous, and much easier to attack.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Using real examples from political debate and cable news, we look at the difference between challenging what someone actually said and attacking a position they never held.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The next time you hear an argument that sounds almost &lt;i&gt;too&lt;/i&gt; easy to knock down, ask:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What did the person actually say?&lt;br /&gt;Is that what’s being challenged?&lt;br /&gt;Or has their position been replaced with something easier to attack?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Because when we start debating positions nobody actually holds, the real argument disappears.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Think Freely. Question Everything.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:43</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>The Easiest Argument to Win? One Nobody Made</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Court Said NO. The Kennedy Center Board Did It Anyway.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge ruled that only Congress can change the name of the Kennedy Center. The Trump name came down.</p><p>You might think that would have ended it.</p><p>Instead, the Kennedy Center Board voted again, this time approving a new inscription crediting President Donald Trump with restoring and renovating the building, even though the renovation is being funded with $257 million in congressionally approved federal taxpayer dollars.</p><p>So is this a clever legal workaround, or something much worse?</p><p>This week's <b>Worst</b> isn't just about Donald Trump. It's about the Kennedy Center Board of Trustees and a much bigger question:</p><p><b>When does loyalty to a political figure become more important than loyalty to the institution you're supposed to protect?</b></p><p>Chris breaks it down.</p><p><b>Stay Fierce. Stay Independent.</b></p><p>#KennedyCenter #Trump #Politics #PoliticalCommentary #FiercelyIndependent #ThisWeeksWorst</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">0f24ccc0-9a2b-4b5c-b025-f7c1f9860f6f</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 16:55:04 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/fa6c15784f84270738520282f56245c06c412f9473f3de377b6b492437a7ad3d/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIwZjI0Y2NjMC05YTJiLTRiNWMtYjAyNS1mN2MxZjk4NjBmNmYiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE3ZjQ3YzE2YmEzNTcwNTc0NTBlMzQ1L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi04LTE0X18xOC01Mi0xNy5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5243863" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/0f24ccc0-9a2b-4b5c-b025-f7c1f9860f6f/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;A federal judge ruled that only Congress can change the name of the Kennedy Center. The Trump name came down.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You might think that would have ended it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Instead, the Kennedy Center Board voted again, this time approving a new inscription crediting President Donald Trump with restoring and renovating the building, even though the renovation is being funded with $257 million in congressionally approved federal taxpayer dollars.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So is this a clever legal workaround, or something much worse?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This week&apos;s &lt;b&gt;Worst&lt;/b&gt; isn&apos;t just about Donald Trump. It&apos;s about the Kennedy Center Board of Trustees and a much bigger question:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;When does loyalty to a political figure become more important than loyalty to the institution you&apos;re supposed to protect?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Chris breaks it down.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Stay Fierce. Stay Independent.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#KennedyCenter #Trump #Politics #PoliticalCommentary #FiercelyIndependent #ThisWeeksWorst&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:44</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>The Court Said NO. The Kennedy Center Board Did It Anyway.</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[$20 Million for ICE Shock Gloves, With No Clear Rules?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>ICE is preparing to spend as much as <b>$20 million in taxpayer dollars</b> on thousands of electrified gloves designed to shock people into compliance.</p><p>But there’s a much bigger question: <b>What are the rules for using them?</b></p><p>Right now, ICE has a general use-of-force policy, but no specific publicly identified rules governing when these gloves can be activated, how long someone can be shocked, or what happens when their use crosses the line.</p><p>The manufacturer itself warns against using the gloves for verbal defiance or punishment and advises against prolonged shocks. And a lawsuit in Kentucky raises even more serious questions after a 43-year-old man allegedly was shocked 27 times with the gloves, along with 13 Taser deployments. The glove shocks have not been established as the cause of his death.</p><p>If ICE wants another use-of-force weapon, the public should know the rules <b>before the gloves go on</b>.</p><p>What training will officers receive?<br />When is shocking someone justified?<br />How will activations be audited?<br />And what happens when the electronic record doesn’t match an officer’s use-of-force report?</p><p>This isn’t about whether ICE officers should be able to protect themselves. It’s about how much power government agents should have to inflict serious bodily harm without clear, transparent limits.</p><p><b>Think Freely. Question Everything.</b></p><p>Subscribe to Fiercely Independent for independent political commentary, news analysis, interviews, and perspectives that challenge the conventional narrative.</p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">ab593b8d-7e0e-444e-940f-38b96d7e91bf</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 16:05:34 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/7abf89f84fb9111b5dc5182946cad9eb5c58518d628f4113192fa61f89cf1a4d/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJhYjU5M2I4ZC03ZTBlLTQ0NGUtOTQwZi0zOGI5NmQ3ZTkxYmYiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE3ZGVhNTVhNDI3ZTZlMWQxN2NlZDA2L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi04LTEzX18xOC0xLTI1Lm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5124327" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/ab593b8d-7e0e-444e-940f-38b96d7e91bf/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;ICE is preparing to spend as much as &lt;b&gt;$20 million in taxpayer dollars&lt;/b&gt; on thousands of electrified gloves designed to shock people into compliance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But there’s a much bigger question: &lt;b&gt;What are the rules for using them?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Right now, ICE has a general use-of-force policy, but no specific publicly identified rules governing when these gloves can be activated, how long someone can be shocked, or what happens when their use crosses the line.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The manufacturer itself warns against using the gloves for verbal defiance or punishment and advises against prolonged shocks. And a lawsuit in Kentucky raises even more serious questions after a 43-year-old man allegedly was shocked 27 times with the gloves, along with 13 Taser deployments. The glove shocks have not been established as the cause of his death.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If ICE wants another use-of-force weapon, the public should know the rules &lt;b&gt;before the gloves go on&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What training will officers receive?&lt;br /&gt;When is shocking someone justified?&lt;br /&gt;How will activations be audited?&lt;br /&gt;And what happens when the electronic record doesn’t match an officer’s use-of-force report?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This isn’t about whether ICE officers should be able to protect themselves. It’s about how much power government agents should have to inflict serious bodily harm without clear, transparent limits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Think Freely. Question Everything.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Subscribe to Fiercely Independent for independent political commentary, news analysis, interviews, and perspectives that challenge the conventional narrative.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:40</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>$20 Million for ICE Shock Gloves, With No Clear Rules?</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[You Wanted Change. But Did You Vote for a Revolution?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Wisconsin Democrats just came incredibly close to nominating democratic socialist Francesca Hong for governor.</p><p>But this story is bigger than one candidate or one election.</p><p>Americans are demanding change on healthcare, housing, childcare, immigration, the cost of living and a political system many believe simply isn’t working.</p><p>The question is: <b>when does reform become revolution?</b></p><p>There is a major difference between fixing institutions that are failing and deciding the institutions themselves should be dismantled.</p><p>In this episode of <b>Fiercely Independent</b>, Chris looks at the razor-thin Wisconsin Democratic primary, the growing influence of democratic socialism, and a question both political parties should be forced to confront:</p><p><b>Does public anger give political movements permission to tear down the system, or a mandate to fix it?</b></p><p>Change and revolution are not the same thing.</p><p><b>Think Freely. Question Everything.</b></p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">f3550b42-12eb-401b-b22b-3e9501541d10</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:21:38 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/df023488a679e57c3c2ad00d82f18f35794fe324abe71a5054229f841bfbf099/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJmMzU1MGI0Mi0xMmViLTQwMWItYjIyYi0zZTk1MDE1NDFkMTAiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE3Y2I4NTI5OWM4M2EzY2E3MGIxMTY5L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi04LTEyX18yMC0xNS00Ni5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5450335" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/f3550b42-12eb-401b-b22b-3e9501541d10/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Wisconsin Democrats just came incredibly close to nominating democratic socialist Francesca Hong for governor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But this story is bigger than one candidate or one election.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Americans are demanding change on healthcare, housing, childcare, immigration, the cost of living and a political system many believe simply isn’t working.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The question is: &lt;b&gt;when does reform become revolution?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There is a major difference between fixing institutions that are failing and deciding the institutions themselves should be dismantled.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this episode of &lt;b&gt;Fiercely Independent&lt;/b&gt;, Chris looks at the razor-thin Wisconsin Democratic primary, the growing influence of democratic socialism, and a question both political parties should be forced to confront:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Does public anger give political movements permission to tear down the system, or a mandate to fix it?&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Change and revolution are not the same thing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Think Freely. Question Everything.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:50</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>You Wanted Change. But Did You Vote for a Revolution?</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[“I Can’t Prove It” Isn’t Evidence | Spot the Spin]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>What happens when someone admits they can’t prove a claim, then uses that lack of proof to make you suspicious anyway?</p><p>That’s the <b>appeal to ignorance</b>, a logical fallacy that turns uncertainty, suspicion, and “everybody knows” into supposed evidence.</p><p>In this episode of <b>Spot the Spin</b>, Chris breaks down recent examples involving election claims from Jesse Watters, Greg Gutfeld, and House Speaker Mike Johnson, and shows you how to recognize the tactic when politicians and pundits use it.</p><p>The next time you hear a claim built around a hunch, ask:</p><p>• What exactly is the claim?<br />• What actual evidence supports it?<br />• What evidence would make them admit they’re wrong?</p><p>Because <b>“prove me wrong” is not evidence that you’re right.</b></p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p>#SpotTheSpin #LogicalFallacies #MediaLiteracy #Politics #CriticalThinking #FiercelyIndependent</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">72212a8e-ad07-4377-bc2d-878ca84274af</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2026 18:16:44 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/e0da0bce275ff1ece9b844013872fe7087335a0bf42455eaaa5ab48b7afb8392/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI3MjIxMmE4ZS1hZDA3LTQzNzctYmMyZC04NzhjYTg0Mjc0YWYiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE3YTE0YWQ0MDgyOGIyZDA3NjdhMDVjL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi04LTEwX18yMC0xMy0xLm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5491295" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/72212a8e-ad07-4377-bc2d-878ca84274af/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;What happens when someone admits they can’t prove a claim, then uses that lack of proof to make you suspicious anyway?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That’s the &lt;b&gt;appeal to ignorance&lt;/b&gt;, a logical fallacy that turns uncertainty, suspicion, and “everybody knows” into supposed evidence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this episode of &lt;b&gt;Spot the Spin&lt;/b&gt;, Chris breaks down recent examples involving election claims from Jesse Watters, Greg Gutfeld, and House Speaker Mike Johnson, and shows you how to recognize the tactic when politicians and pundits use it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The next time you hear a claim built around a hunch, ask:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;• What exactly is the claim?&lt;br /&gt;• What actual evidence supports it?&lt;br /&gt;• What evidence would make them admit they’re wrong?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Because &lt;b&gt;“prove me wrong” is not evidence that you’re right.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#SpotTheSpin #LogicalFallacies #MediaLiteracy #Politics #CriticalThinking #FiercelyIndependent&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:52</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>“I Can’t Prove It” Isn’t Evidence | Spot the Spin</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump’s Reflecting Pool Disaster Nearly Put an Innocent Man in Prison]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A botched renovation. A vandalism story. And an innocent American facing up to 10 years in prison.</p><p>The Trump administration blamed vandals after problems emerged with the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool renovation. But when prosecutors brought a felony case against David Hearn, the evidence pointed somewhere else: the contractor.</p><p>The case eventually collapsed.</p><p>This isn’t just a story about a failed government project. It’s about what can happen when protecting a political narrative becomes more important than admitting a mistake.</p><p>This week on Fiercely Independent, Chris breaks down the Reflecting Pool debacle and why it earns the title of <b>This Week’s Worst.</b></p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">f0ca9923-991b-4513-a767-efe02bbf4036</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 17:23:53 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/04eb4ab9a148b622514f1ac9ebbe3ea09c6cf1c13a99947b02301d50c4490a3d/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJmMGNhOTkyMy05OTFiLTQ1MTMtYTc2Ny1lZmUwMmJiZjQwMzYiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE3NjEzYWM0Mjg1NDJiZmM4YTZlYmRhL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi04LTdfXzE5LTE5LTQwLm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5415227" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/f0ca9923-991b-4513-a767-efe02bbf4036/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;A botched renovation. A vandalism story. And an innocent American facing up to 10 years in prison.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Trump administration blamed vandals after problems emerged with the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool renovation. But when prosecutors brought a felony case against David Hearn, the evidence pointed somewhere else: the contractor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The case eventually collapsed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This isn’t just a story about a failed government project. It’s about what can happen when protecting a political narrative becomes more important than admitting a mistake.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This week on Fiercely Independent, Chris breaks down the Reflecting Pool debacle and why it earns the title of &lt;b&gt;This Week’s Worst.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:49</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Trump’s Reflecting Pool Disaster Nearly Put an Innocent Man in Prison</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump Says It’s a “Golden Age.” Your Bank Account Says Otherwise.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Donald Trump says America has entered a new economic “golden age.” But who exactly is experiencing it?</p><p>Administration officials predicted explosive economic growth, claimed foreign countries were paying the tariffs, and celebrated supposedly historic exports. The actual numbers tell a very different story.</p><p>Meanwhile, Americans are still paying more for groceries, gasoline, housing, and everyday necessities.</p><p>This is not about party loyalty. It is about comparing political claims with economic reality.</p><p>Watch the full breakdown, decide for yourself, and tell me in the comments:</p><p>Does this economy feel like a golden age to you?</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p>#Trump #Economy #Inflation #Tariffs #CostOfLiving #Politics #PoliticalCommentary #IndependentMedia #FiercelyIndependent</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">0660b95d-4768-4998-b918-f1195825f966</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:58:17 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/a6f196a7e6f4008fbd7aa4bf9da232899a9993723d5e51b9efdb44229910aeb9/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIwNjYwYjk1ZC00NzY4LTQ5OTgtYjkxOC1mMTE5NTgyNWY5NjYiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE3NGFlODVkMzFmMWZlMGExMTc0ZTBhL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi04LTZfXzE3LTU1LTQ5Lm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5355041" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/0660b95d-4768-4998-b918-f1195825f966/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Donald Trump says America has entered a new economic “golden age.” But who exactly is experiencing it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Administration officials predicted explosive economic growth, claimed foreign countries were paying the tariffs, and celebrated supposedly historic exports. The actual numbers tell a very different story.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, Americans are still paying more for groceries, gasoline, housing, and everyday necessities.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is not about party loyalty. It is about comparing political claims with economic reality.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Watch the full breakdown, decide for yourself, and tell me in the comments:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Does this economy feel like a golden age to you?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#Trump #Economy #Inflation #Tariffs #CostOfLiving #Politics #PoliticalCommentary #IndependentMedia #FiercelyIndependent&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:47</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Trump Says It’s a “Golden Age.” Your Bank Account Says Otherwise.</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[AIPAC’s Money Is Changing Who Represents You]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><br />Should local voters choose their representatives, or should a powerful foreign-policy lobbying network help decide the outcome?</p><p>AIPAC and its affiliated political groups spend millions supporting candidates who back their position on Israel and defeating candidates who challenge it. But many of the ads voters see barely mention Israel or Gaza. Instead, they focus on jobs, healthcare, manufacturing, and carefully selected personal stories.</p><p>This is not a debate about religion or ethnicity. It is a debate about money, transparency, political power, and whether candidates are being subjected to a foreign-policy loyalty test.</p><p>Watch the full breakdown, then tell us: Should organizations spending millions to influence an election be required to clearly disclose why they are involved?</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p>#AIPAC #PoliticalMoney #CampaignFinance #SuperPAC #USPolitics #ElectionInfluence #PoliticalTransparency #Congress #Israel #Gaza #FiercelyIndependent</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">673973f8-c6a2-4158-a6b3-595314cd2c4e</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 17:15:58 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/23cf0526352dfe309cd60d1d89784ac2b3586b2614ae5a9739f1f6217ba707ff/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI2NzM5NzNmOC1jNmEyLTQxNTgtYTZiMy01OTUzMTRjZDJjNGUiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE3MzZmMzBjNmNjMGZmYjVjZDFkNTY3L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi04LTVfXzE5LTEzLTIwLm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5524732" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/673973f8-c6a2-4158-a6b3-595314cd2c4e/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Should local voters choose their representatives, or should a powerful foreign-policy lobbying network help decide the outcome?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;AIPAC and its affiliated political groups spend millions supporting candidates who back their position on Israel and defeating candidates who challenge it. But many of the ads voters see barely mention Israel or Gaza. Instead, they focus on jobs, healthcare, manufacturing, and carefully selected personal stories.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is not a debate about religion or ethnicity. It is a debate about money, transparency, political power, and whether candidates are being subjected to a foreign-policy loyalty test.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Watch the full breakdown, then tell us: Should organizations spending millions to influence an election be required to clearly disclose why they are involved?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#AIPAC #PoliticalMoney #CampaignFinance #SuperPAC #USPolitics #ElectionInfluence #PoliticalTransparency #Congress #Israel #Gaza #FiercelyIndependent&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:53</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>AIPAC’s Money Is Changing Who Represents You</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Palantir: Big Brother Is Already Here]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Palantir’s software does more than collect data. It connects government records, travel history, financial information, employment data, known associates, and other digital footprints to build a detailed picture of who you are and what you may do next.</p><p>The deeper concern is not simply surveillance. It is what happens when government agencies rely on a private company’s proprietary system, while the public has little ability to see the data, challenge errors, or understand how conclusions are being made.</p><p>Big Brother may not need cameras inside your home. It may already have enough data to predict your next move.</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p>#Palantir #BigBrother #GovernmentSurveillance #DataPrivacy #ArtificialIntelligence #CivilLiberties #PrivacyRights #FiercelyIndependent</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">534e1a41-00e1-408e-8153-fc7228eea65e</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2026 19:25:45 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/7e7fe060acc8de9f225cff3e126e8dbbb19a9bae266a49433b06d46ebbb7882a/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI1MzRlMWE0MS0wMGUxLTQwOGUtODE1My1mYzcyMjhlZWE2NWUiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE3MjNjMjcyYjgxZWUxMDJhOWQ4MzYxL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi04LTRfXzIxLTIzLTE5Lm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5421914" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/534e1a41-00e1-408e-8153-fc7228eea65e/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Palantir’s software does more than collect data. It connects government records, travel history, financial information, employment data, known associates, and other digital footprints to build a detailed picture of who you are and what you may do next.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The deeper concern is not simply surveillance. It is what happens when government agencies rely on a private company’s proprietary system, while the public has little ability to see the data, challenge errors, or understand how conclusions are being made.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Big Brother may not need cameras inside your home. It may already have enough data to predict your next move.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#Palantir #BigBrother #GovernmentSurveillance #DataPrivacy #ArtificialIntelligence #CivilLiberties #PrivacyRights #FiercelyIndependent&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:49</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Palantir: Big Brother Is Already Here</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[How One True Story Creates a False Narrative]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A story can be completely true and still be used to mislead you.</p><p>In this week’s <i>Spot the Spin</i>, Chris breaks down the hasty generalization fallacy: when politicians and pundits take one example, a tiny sample, or an isolated incident and present it as proof of a widespread problem.</p><p>Before accepting the claim, ask three questions:</p><ol><li>How many examples are there?</li><li>How representative are they?</li><li>What is the denominator?</li></ol><p>An anecdote may prove that something happened. It cannot prove how often it happens or how large the problem really is.</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">bb0eaa8b-e6e5-413e-8dbc-17977eea87e9</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 19:11:50 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/b9ced9f68027c804565332f1e457cae4909ecbffb1e2d4642715f67f023c9890/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJiYjBlYWE4Yi1lNmU1LTQxM2UtOGRiYy0xNzk3N2VlYTg3ZTkiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE3MGU3MmIzZTI5NTE1ZWEzMjQ5MWEzL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi04LTNfXzIxLTgtMjcubXAzIn0=.mp3" length="5697767" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/bb0eaa8b-e6e5-413e-8dbc-17977eea87e9/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;A story can be completely true and still be used to mislead you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this week’s &lt;i&gt;Spot the Spin&lt;/i&gt;, Chris breaks down the hasty generalization fallacy: when politicians and pundits take one example, a tiny sample, or an isolated incident and present it as proof of a widespread problem.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Before accepting the claim, ask three questions:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;How many examples are there?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;How representative are they?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;What is the denominator?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;p&gt;An anecdote may prove that something happened. It cannot prove how often it happens or how large the problem really is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:58</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>How One True Story Creates a False Narrative</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why Does the Government Want Your Emergency Room Records?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Your name. Your address. Your diagnosis. Your emergency room visit.</p><p>The Consumer Product Safety Commission reportedly wants hospitals to transmit identifiable patient records through a private third-party contractor by the end of the year.</p><p>The government says the information could help identify dangerous products. But that does not explain why officials need to know exactly who the patient is.</p><p>Where are the safeguards? Who can access the database? Could the information be shared with other agencies? What happens if the contractor is hacked, misuses the information, or sells it?</p><p>Going to the emergency room should not automatically enroll Americans in an undefined government surveillance system.</p><p>This week’s worst: turning private medical emergencies into government data.</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p>#Privacy #GovernmentSurveillance #MedicalPrivacy #EmergencyRoom #HIPAA #CivilLiberties #FiercelyIndependent</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2696382d-8f53-4f80-9b1c-2da29aeeff04</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 17:13:17 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/168bd55fe9150c9eaae607dd290545e977727138f6bc24325243ac06efad09cb/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIyNjk2MzgyZC04ZjUzLTRmODAtOWIxYy0yZGEyOWFlZWZmMDQiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE2Y2Q3MTFlYTE2OGZiYWFlMDRkMDcwL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTMxX18xOS0xMC00MS5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="4784108" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/2696382d-8f53-4f80-9b1c-2da29aeeff04/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Your name. Your address. Your diagnosis. Your emergency room visit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Consumer Product Safety Commission reportedly wants hospitals to transmit identifiable patient records through a private third-party contractor by the end of the year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The government says the information could help identify dangerous products. But that does not explain why officials need to know exactly who the patient is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Where are the safeguards? Who can access the database? Could the information be shared with other agencies? What happens if the contractor is hacked, misuses the information, or sells it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Going to the emergency room should not automatically enroll Americans in an undefined government surveillance system.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This week’s worst: turning private medical emergencies into government data.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#Privacy #GovernmentSurveillance #MedicalPrivacy #EmergencyRoom #HIPAA #CivilLiberties #FiercelyIndependent&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:29</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Why Does the Government Want Your Emergency Room Records?</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Fauci Took the Fifth. Republicans Forgot Trump Did It 400 Times.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Anthony Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times during a Senate committee hearing, and Republicans immediately treated his silence as evidence of guilt.</p><p>But there is one problem: Donald Trump invoked that same constitutional right more than 400 times during a 2022 deposition.</p><p>The Fifth Amendment is not a confession. It protects Fauci, Trump, and every American from government coercion. Congress should investigate, subpoena records, question witnesses, and follow the evidence. What it should not do is call the Fifth Amendment suspicious only when the other side uses it.</p><p>This is not about defending Fauci. It is about exposing a political double standard and defending a constitutional right that belongs to everyone.</p><p><b>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</b></p><p>#Fauci #DonaldTrump #JoshHawley #FifthAmendment #Politics #PoliticalHypocrisy #Congress #Constitution #FiercelyIndependent</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">061672e8-8550-4727-bfe5-aea23760b3e7</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 17:29:26 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/dcf61fbd6a1d695e0d3a0bc393e22a9cfa81760eabad589ff1c499cbe98ebc88/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIwNjE2NzJlOC04NTUwLTQ3MjctYmZlNS1hZWEyMzc2MGIzZTciLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE2Yjg5NWMyOWU2MDJmODk0MDgxNDM0L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTMwX18xOS0yNi01Mi5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5243028" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/061672e8-8550-4727-bfe5-aea23760b3e7/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Dr. Anthony Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times during a Senate committee hearing, and Republicans immediately treated his silence as evidence of guilt.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But there is one problem: Donald Trump invoked that same constitutional right more than 400 times during a 2022 deposition.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Fifth Amendment is not a confession. It protects Fauci, Trump, and every American from government coercion. Congress should investigate, subpoena records, question witnesses, and follow the evidence. What it should not do is call the Fifth Amendment suspicious only when the other side uses it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is not about defending Fauci. It is about exposing a political double standard and defending a constitutional right that belongs to everyone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#Fauci #DonaldTrump #JoshHawley #FifthAmendment #Politics #PoliticalHypocrisy #Congress #Constitution #FiercelyIndependent&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:44</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Fauci Took the Fifth. Republicans Forgot Trump Did It 400 Times.</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Independent Media Is Exploding. But Can You Trust It?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Trust in mainstream media has fallen to a record low, while independent voices are gaining more influence than ever.</p><p>But independent media and fake news are not the same thing.</p><p>Credible independent media challenges power with evidence, transparency, sourcing, and accountability. Fake news uses outrage, emotion, and deception to tell audiences exactly what they want to hear.</p><p>In this episode of Fiercely Independent, Chris examines the credibility crisis facing mainstream outlets, the controversy surrounding changes at 60 Minutes, and the standard every independent media organization should be held to.</p><p>One challenges power. The other manufactures a narrative.</p><p></p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p>#IndependentMedia #FakeNews #MainstreamMedia #MediaBias #60Minutes #CBSNews #FiercelyIndependent #PoliticalCommentary #MediaLiteracy #NewsAnalysis</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">c2e38df7-ccab-479b-a132-f10d4f93263f</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 18:58:11 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/85044278141f05ec73633341196d4df564624c00cf1126844dfadfe7c052c186/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJjMmUzOGRmNy1jY2FiLTQ3OWItYTEzMi1mMTBkNGY5MzI2M2YiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE2YTRjODcyMTBjYTA0MWUzYjkwNzFkL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTI5X18yMC01NS0zLm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5462874" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/c2e38df7-ccab-479b-a132-f10d4f93263f/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Trust in mainstream media has fallen to a record low, while independent voices are gaining more influence than ever.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But independent media and fake news are not the same thing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Credible independent media challenges power with evidence, transparency, sourcing, and accountability. Fake news uses outrage, emotion, and deception to tell audiences exactly what they want to hear.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this episode of Fiercely Independent, Chris examines the credibility crisis facing mainstream outlets, the controversy surrounding changes at 60 Minutes, and the standard every independent media organization should be held to.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One challenges power. The other manufactures a narrative.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#IndependentMedia #FakeNews #MainstreamMedia #MediaBias #60Minutes #CBSNews #FiercelyIndependent #PoliticalCommentary #MediaLiteracy #NewsAnalysis&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:51</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Independent Media Is Exploding. But Can You Trust It?</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Trump Wants to Kill the Filibuster. Republicans May Regret It.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>President Trump wants Senate Republicans to eliminate the filibuster so they can pass the SAVE Act. But Senate Majority Leader John Thune understands the danger: once Republicans destroy the 60-vote threshold, the next Democratic majority could use that same power against them.</p><p>Gun restrictions. Expanding the Supreme Court. Abolishing ICE. Sweeping legislation passed with a simple majority.</p><p>This is not just about one bill. It is about whether Republicans should surrender one of their strongest protections against the next Democratic-controlled Senate.</p><p>Trump is thinking about the next vote. Thune is thinking about the next majority. And right now, Thune may be the only adult in the room.</p><p></p><p>Subscribe to <b>Fiercely Independent</b> for political commentary that challenges the spin, questions the extremes, and follows the evidence.</p><p>#Trump #Filibuster #JohnThune #Senate #SAVEAct #Republicans #Politics #FiercelyIndependent</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">33382d7b-3850-43b4-8a17-08d2fa08aac5</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 18:43:46 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/5cb794d66d21a91e13ff6434f8d4a8a4a76b1af85ab7a8729cfb5771e19a3550/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIzMzM4MmQ3Yi0zODUwLTQzYjQtOGExNy0wOGQyZmEwOGFhYzUiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE2OGY3Mjg3YThjMDQyODkyNzk3ZDdkL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTI4X18yMC0zOC0zMi5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5170303" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/33382d7b-3850-43b4-8a17-08d2fa08aac5/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;President Trump wants Senate Republicans to eliminate the filibuster so they can pass the SAVE Act. But Senate Majority Leader John Thune understands the danger: once Republicans destroy the 60-vote threshold, the next Democratic majority could use that same power against them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gun restrictions. Expanding the Supreme Court. Abolishing ICE. Sweeping legislation passed with a simple majority.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is not just about one bill. It is about whether Republicans should surrender one of their strongest protections against the next Democratic-controlled Senate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Trump is thinking about the next vote. Thune is thinking about the next majority. And right now, Thune may be the only adult in the room.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Subscribe to &lt;b&gt;Fiercely Independent&lt;/b&gt; for political commentary that challenges the spin, questions the extremes, and follows the evidence.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#Trump #Filibuster #JohnThune #Senate #SAVEAct #Republicans #Politics #FiercelyIndependent&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:42</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Trump Wants to Kill the Filibuster. Republicans May Regret It.</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[The White House Changed Its Definition of Victory]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The administration began Operation Epic Fury with four sweeping objectives: eliminate Iran’s nuclear threat, destroy its ballistic missile arsenal, degrade its proxy networks, and cripple its military forces.</p><p>Now, the stated goal appears to be negotiations and resolving control of the Strait of Hormuz.</p><p>Is that a legitimate change in strategy, or is the White House moving the goalposts to declare victory?</p><p>In this week’s <i>Spot the Spin</i>, Chris explains the three questions you should ask whenever a politician claims success:</p><ol><li>What was the original promise?</li><li>Was it actually fulfilled?</li><li>Did the definition of success change?</li></ol><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p>Today’s episode is sponsored by <b>FLIPAL</b>, the daily phrase game where you flip the tiles, solve the phrase, and see how you rank.</p><p>Play today’s puzzle at <a rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" href="http://FLIPAL.com" target="_blank">FLIPAL.com</a>.</p><p>#IranWar #WhiteHouse #Politics #SpotTheSpin #FiercelyIndependent #FLIPAL</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">f730230d-6a83-470f-b9e1-7a803ebe7d56</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 18:01:41 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/cd6ecec946da2ef679eca8f4e668bda27da17c03d30310ada5d7053f8fd56d8f/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJmNzMwMjMwZC02YTgzLTQ3MGYtYjllMS03YTgwM2ViZTdkNTYiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE2Nzk4MWEyNzkxZDQzMmY3ZjUzOGQ3L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTI3X18xOS00MC00Mi5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="4977206" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/f730230d-6a83-470f-b9e1-7a803ebe7d56/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;The administration began Operation Epic Fury with four sweeping objectives: eliminate Iran’s nuclear threat, destroy its ballistic missile arsenal, degrade its proxy networks, and cripple its military forces.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now, the stated goal appears to be negotiations and resolving control of the Strait of Hormuz.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is that a legitimate change in strategy, or is the White House moving the goalposts to declare victory?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this week’s &lt;i&gt;Spot the Spin&lt;/i&gt;, Chris explains the three questions you should ask whenever a politician claims success:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;What was the original promise?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Was it actually fulfilled?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Did the definition of success change?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Today’s episode is sponsored by &lt;b&gt;FLIPAL&lt;/b&gt;, the daily phrase game where you flip the tiles, solve the phrase, and see how you rank.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Play today’s puzzle at &lt;a rel=&quot;noopener noreferrer nofollow&quot; href=&quot;http://FLIPAL.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;FLIPAL.com&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#IranWar #WhiteHouse #Politics #SpotTheSpin #FiercelyIndependent #FLIPAL&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:36</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>The White House Changed Its Definition of Victory</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Tennessee Found a Legal Loophole to Rig the Map]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>What happens when politicians cannot win over voters? They change which voters count.</p><p>Tennessee lawmakers moved to allow mid-decade redistricting as Republicans faced concerns about losing political power. When the new map was challenged, the state openly argued that its motivation was political, not racial.</p><p>That distinction exposed a disturbing legal loophole: when race and political affiliation overlap, lawmakers can claim they are targeting Democrats rather than Black voters.</p><p>The lawsuit is not over, and the court’s ruling was only preliminary. But the larger problem is already clear. Gerrymandering allows politicians to choose their voters, weakens competitive elections, rewards ideological extremes, and makes elected officials less accountable to the public.</p><p>Republican gerrymandering is not justified because Democrats have done it. Democratic gerrymandering is not justified because Republicans do it.</p><p>When politicians cannot win with better policies, they should change their policies, not the map.</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">db2512ab-44e9-4d81-982f-147eca091d74</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2026 18:40:18 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/cd6240582a3d9f0afcd97961ce53348c53ea525b1d0a9b393a197b952a671896/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJkYjI1MTJhYi00NGU5LTRkODEtOTgyZi0xNDdlY2EwOTFkNzQiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE2M2IwZTlhNDU2ODRkODdmMGZlZmM0L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTI0X18yMC0zNy0yOS5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5257238" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/db2512ab-44e9-4d81-982f-147eca091d74/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;What happens when politicians cannot win over voters? They change which voters count.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tennessee lawmakers moved to allow mid-decade redistricting as Republicans faced concerns about losing political power. When the new map was challenged, the state openly argued that its motivation was political, not racial.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That distinction exposed a disturbing legal loophole: when race and political affiliation overlap, lawmakers can claim they are targeting Democrats rather than Black voters.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The lawsuit is not over, and the court’s ruling was only preliminary. But the larger problem is already clear. Gerrymandering allows politicians to choose their voters, weakens competitive elections, rewards ideological extremes, and makes elected officials less accountable to the public.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Republican gerrymandering is not justified because Democrats have done it. Democratic gerrymandering is not justified because Republicans do it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When politicians cannot win with better policies, they should change their policies, not the map.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:44</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Tennessee Found a Legal Loophole to Rig the Map</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[America Is Drifting Into a Two-Front War With No Exit Plan]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The United States may be moving toward a two-front conflict involving Iran in the Persian Gulf and the Houthis in the Red Sea, yet almost nobody is asking the most important question: What is the actual endgame?</p><p>Two strategic waterways. Two hostile forces. More strikes, deployments, and opportunities for escalation.</p><p>History shows that wars fought on multiple fronts divide resources, complicate intelligence, and make every response more unpredictable. A strike against Iran could trigger additional Houthi attacks. A strike against the Houthis could provoke Iran to escalate near the Strait of Hormuz.</p><p>Meanwhile, Congress continues to avoid its constitutional responsibility.</p><p>How many military strikes, deployments, and casualties must occur before elected officials admit that this has become a war? What is the objective? What does victory look like? And who authorized an open-ended commitment to defend both waterways?</p><p>Because when nobody can describe the finish line, it is not a mission.</p><p><b>It is a subscription.</b></p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">89ecf3be-348d-4f7a-bbe7-ed07b1673514</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 18:47:00 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/64dbbd81db6630f2edb005b54874705374b48e0c3811b3e036e6a25cc29543c1/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI4OWVjZjNiZS0zNDhkLTRmN2EtYmJlNy1lZDA3YjE2NzM1MTQiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE2MjYxMDNhZTU3OGU3MDhmYWZkMDMwL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTIzX18yMC00NC0xOS5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5277300" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/89ecf3be-348d-4f7a-bbe7-ed07b1673514/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;The United States may be moving toward a two-front conflict involving Iran in the Persian Gulf and the Houthis in the Red Sea, yet almost nobody is asking the most important question: What is the actual endgame?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Two strategic waterways. Two hostile forces. More strikes, deployments, and opportunities for escalation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;History shows that wars fought on multiple fronts divide resources, complicate intelligence, and make every response more unpredictable. A strike against Iran could trigger additional Houthi attacks. A strike against the Houthis could provoke Iran to escalate near the Strait of Hormuz.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, Congress continues to avoid its constitutional responsibility.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How many military strikes, deployments, and casualties must occur before elected officials admit that this has become a war? What is the objective? What does victory look like? And who authorized an open-ended commitment to defend both waterways?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Because when nobody can describe the finish line, it is not a mission.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;It is a subscription.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:45</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>America Is Drifting Into a Two-Front War With No Exit Plan</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Congress Is Hiding Trump’s Election Rules Inside Must-Pass Bills]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Congressional leaders are trying to pass controversial election restrictions without giving them an honest, standalone vote.</p><p>Provisions from Trump’s SAVE America Act are being attached to major legislation involving national defense, government funding, and a congressional stock-trading ban. That puts lawmakers in a political trap: oppose the election provisions, and they can be accused of opposing the military, shutting down the government, or protecting corrupt insiders.</p><p>This is not transparent lawmaking. It is political extortion designed to blur accountability and prevent voters from knowing exactly what their representatives supported.</p><p>If these election restrictions are strong enough to become law, they should be strong enough to survive a public debate and a clean vote.</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2e0cd01d-f753-4411-8fb2-2642f6742a55</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 17:28:51 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/191769256d655710ba914e2f067fc59c6b4ea969f2c42df9c72f40268833f77d/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIyZTBjZDAxZC1mNzUzLTQ0MTEtOGZiMi0yNjQyZjY3NDJhNTUiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE2MGZkYTAyNmRmMTljY2M3MzQwMDFlL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTIyX18xOS0yOC0wLm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5173646" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/2e0cd01d-f753-4411-8fb2-2642f6742a55/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Congressional leaders are trying to pass controversial election restrictions without giving them an honest, standalone vote.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Provisions from Trump’s SAVE America Act are being attached to major legislation involving national defense, government funding, and a congressional stock-trading ban. That puts lawmakers in a political trap: oppose the election provisions, and they can be accused of opposing the military, shutting down the government, or protecting corrupt insiders.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is not transparent lawmaking. It is political extortion designed to blur accountability and prevent voters from knowing exactly what their representatives supported.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If these election restrictions are strong enough to become law, they should be strong enough to survive a public debate and a clean vote.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:42</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Congress Is Hiding Trump’s Election Rules Inside Must-Pass Bills</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell Vanished. Why Is He Still a Senator?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Mitch McConnell has been out of public view for more than five weeks following his hospitalization. His office released a written statement and photograph, but there have been no live appearances or direct public communications from the senator himself.</p><p>That raises a much larger constitutional question: What happens when a sitting U.S. senator is alive but potentially unable to perform the job?</p><p>The answer is disturbing. A prolonged incapacity does not automatically create a vacancy, and the Senate has no established process for declaring the seat of a living but incapacitated senator vacant.</p><p>Should Congress require independent health certifications after an extended absence? Should there be age limits? Or are voters simply left without functioning representation?</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p>#MitchMcConnell #Congress #Senate #Politics #GovernmentAccountability #FiercelyIndependent</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4499f3a1-228a-4982-9101-a182ea0fb560</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:52:19 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/f1490a5536fcdaaf13d388b4c365d91b24776c7ae88f364f996ab60328ab72b9/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI0NDk5ZjNhMS0yMjhhLTQ5ODItOTEwMS1hMTgyZWEwZmI1NjAiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE1ZmJmMzUxZWJkZDJkYjAwYzNhZmI1L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTIxX18yMC00OS0yNS5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="4915348" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/4499f3a1-228a-4982-9101-a182ea0fb560/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Mitch McConnell has been out of public view for more than five weeks following his hospitalization. His office released a written statement and photograph, but there have been no live appearances or direct public communications from the senator himself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That raises a much larger constitutional question: What happens when a sitting U.S. senator is alive but potentially unable to perform the job?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The answer is disturbing. A prolonged incapacity does not automatically create a vacancy, and the Senate has no established process for declaring the seat of a living but incapacitated senator vacant.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Should Congress require independent health certifications after an extended absence? Should there be age limits? Or are voters simply left without functioning representation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#MitchMcConnell #Congress #Senate #Politics #GovernmentAccountability #FiercelyIndependent&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:34</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Mitch McConnell Vanished. Why Is He Still a Senator?</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[No Evidence? Change the Subject.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>When a political claim cannot survive scrutiny, watch what happens next.</p><p>After suggesting corruption in California’s election process, Trump offered no evidence of fraudulent ballots, altered votes, or misconduct. Instead, he shifted the attack to NBC, ABC, and the media.</p><p>That is a classic red herring: replace the unanswered question with a new villain, a new outrage, and a more emotional distraction.</p><p>In this week’s <i>Spot the Spin</i>, Chris breaks down how the tactic works and how to recognize it before it pulls your attention away from the original claim.</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">071c675c-5b17-4d3e-8520-251b2e195bf9</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 18:11:30 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/6048788c5ae4ac51ebdfec57922ea77198bc52bc58fa8d447e67e7f9164ec3a2/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIwNzFjNjc1Yy01YjE3LTRkM2UtODUyMC0yNTFiMmUxOTViZjkiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE1ZTYzYzAyNTRiNjg3ZDllN2Y0ZTAxL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTIwX18yMC02LTU2Lm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5112624" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/071c675c-5b17-4d3e-8520-251b2e195bf9/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;When a political claim cannot survive scrutiny, watch what happens next.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After suggesting corruption in California’s election process, Trump offered no evidence of fraudulent ballots, altered votes, or misconduct. Instead, he shifted the attack to NBC, ABC, and the media.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That is a classic red herring: replace the unanswered question with a new villain, a new outrage, and a more emotional distraction.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this week’s &lt;i&gt;Spot the Spin&lt;/i&gt;, Chris breaks down how the tactic works and how to recognize it before it pulls your attention away from the original claim.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:40</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>No Evidence? Change the Subject.</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[The SAVE Act Could Block Millions of Legal Voters]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The SAVE Act is being promoted as election integrity legislation, but does it solve a real problem or create a much larger one?</p><p>Millions of American citizens may not have immediate access to the documents required under the proposed law. Kansas already tested a similar system, and the results were alarming: tens of thousands of voter registrations were blocked while the number of identified noncitizens was microscopic.</p><p>Election integrity should stop unlawful voting without preventing eligible Americans from exercising their constitutional rights.</p><p>The SAVE Act fails that test.</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">959b58ec-2308-472a-8505-34065de48b0a</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2026 20:35:26 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/2138bde59d8edecee0dc173d4073a3bed152e5f89df6633f7613f2b173cdb315/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI5NTliNThlYy0yMzA4LTQ3MmEtODUwNS0zNDA2NWRlNDhiMGEiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE1YTkwZjdjZTJlZmFiOTBhNTAwZDg3L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTE3X18yMi0zMC00Ny5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="11417121" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/959b58ec-2308-472a-8505-34065de48b0a/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;The SAVE Act is being promoted as election integrity legislation, but does it solve a real problem or create a much larger one?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Millions of American citizens may not have immediate access to the documents required under the proposed law. Kansas already tested a similar system, and the results were alarming: tens of thousands of voter registrations were blocked while the number of identified noncitizens was microscopic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Election integrity should stop unlawful voting without preventing eligible Americans from exercising their constitutional rights.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The SAVE Act fails that test.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:05:57</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>The SAVE Act Could Block Millions of Legal Voters</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Who Framed Roger Rogoff?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Roger Rogoff was unanimously appointed by federal judges as Seattle’s top federal prosecutor. Before the hour was over, President Trump removed him.</p><p>Was it a loyalty test? A judicial power grab? Neither explanation tells the full story.</p><p>This episode examines the legal authority of the judges, the president’s power to remove temporary appointees, the Senate’s missing role, and the deeper failure to install a permanent, publicly accountable prosecutor.</p><p>The law may allow the chaos. That does not make the chaos responsible governance.</p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">3558696a-7674-4b7f-81ae-dcc7e7378998</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:05:33 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/8aacc6ad13ac9c98f09dd4228dee14c4c3b167c0927ff7b16c5e1c390a8c669b/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIzNTU4Njk2YS03Njc0LTRiN2YtODFhZS1kY2M3ZTczNzg5OTgiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE1OTM4MzhkNjdhYmU2YmM3NWQzYzFlL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTE2X18yMS01OS01MS5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5180334" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/3558696a-7674-4b7f-81ae-dcc7e7378998/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Roger Rogoff was unanimously appointed by federal judges as Seattle’s top federal prosecutor. Before the hour was over, President Trump removed him.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Was it a loyalty test? A judicial power grab? Neither explanation tells the full story.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This episode examines the legal authority of the judges, the president’s power to remove temporary appointees, the Senate’s missing role, and the deeper failure to install a permanent, publicly accountable prosecutor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The law may allow the chaos. That does not make the chaos responsible governance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:42</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Who Framed Roger Rogoff?</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[A $1.15 Trillion Loyalty Test?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Congress is being asked to approve a record-setting $1.15 trillion defense bill before it has even authorized the war the money may support.</p><p>What is the objective in Iran? What does victory look like? What is the exit strategy, and how much will this cost next year?</p><p>Military funding should not become a test of patriotism or political loyalty. Congress has a constitutional responsibility to debate the war, define its purpose, explain its costs, and put every lawmaker on the record before approving another massive Pentagon budget.</p><p>A trillion dollars can buy a lot, but it cannot buy loyalty or respect.</p><p>#Congress #Iran #MilitarySpending #Pentagon #WarPowers #DefenseBudget #Politics #GovernmentSpending #FiercelyIndependent</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">37679eed-23fb-4cf3-b4f6-6422028d0ef4</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:15:13 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/fde857eae1d36e0ce41b1bd8a717aa581e7821f9c1fe35b121e1e8ca23646cf3/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIzNzY3OWVlZC0yM2ZiLTRjZjMtYjRmNi02NDIyMDI4ZDBlZjQiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE1N2NkYTQwMjMwNzFjYTdhMmQxOWZkL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTE1X18yMC0xMi01Mi5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5383462" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/37679eed-23fb-4cf3-b4f6-6422028d0ef4/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Congress is being asked to approve a record-setting $1.15 trillion defense bill before it has even authorized the war the money may support.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;What is the objective in Iran? What does victory look like? What is the exit strategy, and how much will this cost next year?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Military funding should not become a test of patriotism or political loyalty. Congress has a constitutional responsibility to debate the war, define its purpose, explain its costs, and put every lawmaker on the record before approving another massive Pentagon budget.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A trillion dollars can buy a lot, but it cannot buy loyalty or respect.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#Congress #Iran #MilitarySpending #Pentagon #WarPowers #DefenseBudget #Politics #GovernmentSpending #FiercelyIndependent&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:48</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>A $1.15 Trillion Loyalty Test?</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[America Wants Global Power and Global Immunity
]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The United States supports international law when it targets its enemies. But when the same legal system investigates Americans or U.S. allies, sovereignty suddenly becomes sacred.</p><p>In this episode, Chris examines the administration’s attack on the International Criminal Court and the contradiction at the center of American foreign policy: claiming the power to enforce U.S. law around the world while rejecting outside scrutiny at home.</p><p>You cannot demand global reach for American justice and global immunity from everyone else.</p><p>Is this really about protecting American sovereignty, or creating a one-way legal system?</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">d17f9e44-780d-4e6f-a6dd-d80dbb392f1d</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 20:00:45 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/6d2d5ee12ccebbd718a02eee011c1484169e9304da9ecdc36182616161bef69d/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJkMTdmOWU0NC03ODBkLTRlNmYtYTZkZC1kODBkYmIzOTJmMWQiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE1Njk0ZWQ4MDhkMWZjNjMzN2ExOTY4L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTE0X18yMS01OC0zNy5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5252223" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/d17f9e44-780d-4e6f-a6dd-d80dbb392f1d/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;The United States supports international law when it targets its enemies. But when the same legal system investigates Americans or U.S. allies, sovereignty suddenly becomes sacred.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this episode, Chris examines the administration’s attack on the International Criminal Court and the contradiction at the center of American foreign policy: claiming the power to enforce U.S. law around the world while rejecting outside scrutiny at home.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You cannot demand global reach for American justice and global immunity from everyone else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is this really about protecting American sovereignty, or creating a one-way legal system?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:44</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>America Wants Global Power and Global Immunity
</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Spot the Spin: Correlation Is Not Causation]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Politicians are quick to claim credit when jobs are created, investment increases, or the economy appears to improve. But did their policy actually cause the result, or did the two things simply happen at the same time?</p><p>In this week’s <b>Spot the Spin</b>, Chris examines the difference between causation and correlation using Toyota’s $3.6 billion San Antonio expansion and the claim that tariffs made it happen.</p><p>Before accepting a political victory lap, ask three questions:</p><ol><li>Did the supposed cause happen before the outcome?</li><li>Is there evidence explaining how one produced the other?</li><li>Could another factor better explain what happened?</li></ol><p>Timing is not proof. Taking credit is not evidence. And correlation is not causation.</p><p>Subscribe for more independent political analysis that helps you recognize weak arguments, misleading claims, and the spin hiding behind the headlines.</p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">661adf6a-dbac-4428-b2c3-7c7cc00b9f5e</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2026 19:31:22 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/04a01cb65e7d558897bef30115672bfd4241e3287b1819ad2116c0852af4eab7/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI2NjFhZGY2YS1kYmFjLTQ0MjgtYjJjMy03YzdjYzAwYjlmNWUiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE1NTNjMzA2NTY3MjljMjNmMjIzYjM3L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTEzX18yMS0yNy00NC5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5438632" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/661adf6a-dbac-4428-b2c3-7c7cc00b9f5e/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Politicians are quick to claim credit when jobs are created, investment increases, or the economy appears to improve. But did their policy actually cause the result, or did the two things simply happen at the same time?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this week’s &lt;b&gt;Spot the Spin&lt;/b&gt;, Chris examines the difference between causation and correlation using Toyota’s $3.6 billion San Antonio expansion and the claim that tariffs made it happen.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Before accepting a political victory lap, ask three questions:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Did the supposed cause happen before the outcome?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Is there evidence explaining how one produced the other?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Could another factor better explain what happened?&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;&lt;p&gt;Timing is not proof. Taking credit is not evidence. And correlation is not causation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Subscribe for more independent political analysis that helps you recognize weak arguments, misleading claims, and the spin hiding behind the headlines.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:50</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Spot the Spin: Correlation Is Not Causation</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Election Watchdogs Are Gone. Now What?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The bipartisan Election Assistance Commission has effectively been emptied just months before voters decide control of Congress.</p><p>The commission does not count ballots or choose winners, but it helps set voting-system standards, certify equipment, and support election officials nationwide.</p><p>So why remove the referees before the biggest political contest of the year?</p><p>This could be about installing loyalists, pushing the SAVE Act through administrative power, or laying the groundwork to challenge the results if the election does not go their way.</p><p>When the referees disappear before the game, everyone should pay attention.</p><p>#Midterms #Election2026 #ElectionIntegrity #EAC #SAVEAct #VotingRights #Democracy #Politics #PoliticalNews #FiercelyIndependent</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">86722ef3-ade1-42d3-b1fe-3b94c15e6026</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 18:13:58 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/4df87c22603f1be0a085e82bff0d45ad450168e5e97604fd79059e065ab84c0d/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI4NjcyMmVmMy1hZGUxLTQyZDMtYjFmZS0zYjk0YzE1ZTYwMjYiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE1MTM1YjY2OWIyZmMyYTA5MzQ2MGE5L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTEwX18yMC0xMS0yLm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5255566" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/86722ef3-ade1-42d3-b1fe-3b94c15e6026/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;The bipartisan Election Assistance Commission has effectively been emptied just months before voters decide control of Congress.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The commission does not count ballots or choose winners, but it helps set voting-system standards, certify equipment, and support election officials nationwide.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So why remove the referees before the biggest political contest of the year?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This could be about installing loyalists, pushing the SAVE Act through administrative power, or laying the groundwork to challenge the results if the election does not go their way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When the referees disappear before the game, everyone should pay attention.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#Midterms #Election2026 #ElectionIntegrity #EAC #SAVEAct #VotingRights #Democracy #Politics #PoliticalNews #FiercelyIndependent&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:44</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>The Election Watchdogs Are Gone. Now What?</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Political Dog Whistles: What They Really Mean]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Politicians do not always say the ugly part out loud. Instead, they use coded language that sounds harmless to most people but sends a clear message to a specific audience.</p><p>In this episode, we break down how political dog whistles work, why phrases like “law and order,” “welfare state,” and “globalists” can carry hidden meaning, and how plausible deniability protects the speaker from accountability. The real question is not always what was said, but who it was meant for.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">29ce9e8f-e639-4900-8c4e-0fd40672af04</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 20:56:31 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/6cadefeefd46157e0c31407971e27c8e7bcf8c9ef3a108af86e3c2735a8a02e7/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIyOWNlOWU4Zi1lNjM5LTQ5MDAtOGM0ZS0wZmQ0MDY3MmFmMDQiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE1MDBhNjA2NjljNzg1YTc5ODUwNGRlL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTlfXzIyLTUzLTUyLm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5289839" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/29ce9e8f-e639-4900-8c4e-0fd40672af04/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Politicians do not always say the ugly part out loud. Instead, they use coded language that sounds harmless to most people but sends a clear message to a specific audience.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this episode, we break down how political dog whistles work, why phrases like “law and order,” “welfare state,” and “globalists” can carry hidden meaning, and how plausible deniability protects the speaker from accountability. The real question is not always what was said, but who it was meant for.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:45</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Political Dog Whistles: What They Really Mean</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Chaos the Strategy?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Iran, Greenland, and Spain may seem like separate stories, but together they point to a bigger question: is chaos being used as a political strategy?</p><p>In this episode of <i>Fiercely Independent</i>, Chris breaks down the latest headlines involving Iran, threats toward Spain, Greenland’s strategic value, rare earth minerals, NATO tensions, and whether constant disruption strengthens America or weakens its alliances.</p><p>Chaos may work in the short term, but over time allies adjust, rivals test limits, and noise starts replacing strategy.</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">f4d099b2-d5de-41bd-a7a7-c93d3ff37d70</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 20:37:19 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/86f85f94379202447423fac55ba94be1c98678a16abbe88d908028d239799504/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJmNGQwOTliMi1kNWRlLTQxYmQtYTdhNy1jOTNkM2ZmMzdkNzAiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE0ZWI0ODJkOWUzNzQyZWMwNGU0ZGVjL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LThfXzIyLTM1LTE0Lm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5235504" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/f4d099b2-d5de-41bd-a7a7-c93d3ff37d70/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Iran, Greenland, and Spain may seem like separate stories, but together they point to a bigger question: is chaos being used as a political strategy?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this episode of &lt;i&gt;Fiercely Independent&lt;/i&gt;, Chris breaks down the latest headlines involving Iran, threats toward Spain, Greenland’s strategic value, rare earth minerals, NATO tensions, and whether constant disruption strengthens America or weakens its alliances.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Chaos may work in the short term, but over time allies adjust, rivals test limits, and noise starts replacing strategy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:44</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Is Chaos the Strategy?</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Supreme Court Opens the Door to Even More Dark Money in Politics]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A recent Supreme Court ruling could reshape campaign spending by allowing political parties to spend more in direct coordination with their own candidates.</p><p>Citizens United opened the door to unlimited independent political spending. This takes the influence of super PACs, dark money groups, and major donors one step further by making that spending more targeted, strategic, and connected to campaigns themselves.</p><p>Is this free speech, or is it another step toward a government controlled by the highest bidder?</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p>#DarkMoney #SupremeCourt #CitizensUnited #CampaignFinance #Politics</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">5a905c47-d307-406a-8cb7-8448922c9401</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 19:40:12 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/ce7ec2b2dd7549d68dfec768cf350d071949e39c2991b45be1dd932dd237af2e/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI1YTkwNWM0Ny1kMzA3LTQwNmEtOGNiNy04NDQ4OTIyYzk0MDEiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE0ZDU1N2YyY2Y4N2VmOWI3NjY5N2FkL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTdfXzIxLTM3LTM1Lm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5075008" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/5a905c47-d307-406a-8cb7-8448922c9401/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;A recent Supreme Court ruling could reshape campaign spending by allowing political parties to spend more in direct coordination with their own candidates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Citizens United opened the door to unlimited independent political spending. This takes the influence of super PACs, dark money groups, and major donors one step further by making that spending more targeted, strategic, and connected to campaigns themselves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is this free speech, or is it another step toward a government controlled by the highest bidder?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#DarkMoney #SupremeCourt #CitizensUnited #CampaignFinance #Politics&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:39</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Supreme Court Opens the Door to Even More Dark Money in Politics</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Was the 2020 Election Stolen? Use Occam’s Razor to Spot the Spin]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Was the 2020 election stolen, or does that claim require too many unsupported assumptions?</p><p>In this week’s Spot the Spin, Chris breaks down Occam’s Razor: a simple framework for evaluating competing explanations by asking which one relies on the fewest unsupported assumptions.</p><p>Using the 2020 election as an example, he looks at what would need to be true for a coordinated fraud scheme to have changed the outcome across multiple key states, survived audits, recounts, court challenges, and public scrutiny without credible evidence emerging.</p><p>Occam’s Razor does not mean the simplest answer is always correct. It means the explanation with the fewest unsupported assumptions is usually the one worth leaning toward.</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">84e4a9b6-949f-42b0-998e-1c5ee554c9ac</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 18:26:49 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/4de58b85d8f6a84bc3862e4e83469fd5b9fe92f1f495720779cfee2b2f885dee/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI4NGU0YTliNi05NDlmLTQyYjAtOTk4ZS0xYzVlZTU1NGM5YWMiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE0YmYyNzVmZGE4ZDlkZGE2NWQ4Mzc5L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTZfXzIwLTIyLTQ1Lm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="14342835" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/84e4a9b6-949f-42b0-998e-1c5ee554c9ac/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Was the 2020 election stolen, or does that claim require too many unsupported assumptions?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this week’s Spot the Spin, Chris breaks down Occam’s Razor: a simple framework for evaluating competing explanations by asking which one relies on the fewest unsupported assumptions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Using the 2020 election as an example, he looks at what would need to be true for a coordinated fraud scheme to have changed the outcome across multiple key states, survived audits, recounts, court challenges, and public scrutiny without credible evidence emerging.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Occam’s Razor does not mean the simplest answer is always correct. It means the explanation with the fewest unsupported assumptions is usually the one worth leaning toward.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:07:28</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Was the 2020 Election Stolen? Use Occam’s Razor to Spot the Spin</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[America Turns 250 Tomorrow. Are We Better?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>As America approaches its 250th birthday, Chris looks back at the unity of the 1976 Bicentennial and asks what changed. We are richer, more diverse, and more advanced than ever, but are we losing the trust, truth, and civic responsibility that hold a democracy together?</p><p>Independence is not just something we celebrate on July 4. It is something we have to practice every day.</p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">9afc471b-34d6-4284-b61a-3c426713d3a7</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 20:11:14 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/f1515425ea3f15f7a019e9038147bb0ea9992979218a839e7d04f6191f26e921/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI5YWZjNDcxYi0zNGQ2LTQyODQtYjYxYS0zYzQyNjcxM2QzYTciLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE0ODE2N2QzZjk3ZjQ5NTg2MGEwMGQ3L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTNfXzIyLTctMjQubXAzIn0=.mp3" length="4489865" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/9afc471b-34d6-4284-b61a-3c426713d3a7/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;As America approaches its 250th birthday, Chris looks back at the unity of the 1976 Bicentennial and asks what changed. We are richer, more diverse, and more advanced than ever, but are we losing the trust, truth, and civic responsibility that hold a democracy together?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Independence is not just something we celebrate on July 4. It is something we have to practice every day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:20</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>America Turns 250 Tomorrow. Are We Better?</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Socialism vs. Communism vs. Democratic Socialism: What’s the Difference?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Socialism, communism, and democratic socialism are often treated as interchangeable terms. They are not.</p><p>In this episode of Fiercely Independent, Chris breaks down the practical differences between these economic and political systems, including money, property ownership, government structure, markets, social programs, and individual freedom.</p><p>This is not an argument for one system over another. It is a straightforward guide to understanding what each term actually means, why democratic socialism is not communism, and how elements of socialism already exist within the United States.</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">8bbac553-e4e2-4d8f-aea0-9701f1229b85</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 22:07:31 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/919322f1755b5430cca439a85a8d7501283ad2f85da04991020a1ea377016c5c/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI4YmJhYzU1My1lNGUyLTRkOGYtYWVhMC05NzAxZjEyMjliODUiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE0NmRmZWFiZTU2Y2QxYzFlNGY1Njc3L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTNfXzAtMi0xNy5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="27969976" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/8bbac553-e4e2-4d8f-aea0-9701f1229b85/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Socialism, communism, and democratic socialism are often treated as interchangeable terms. They are not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this episode of Fiercely Independent, Chris breaks down the practical differences between these economic and political systems, including money, property ownership, government structure, markets, social programs, and individual freedom.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is not an argument for one system over another. It is a straightforward guide to understanding what each term actually means, why democratic socialism is not communism, and how elements of socialism already exist within the United States.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:14:34</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Socialism vs. Communism vs. Democratic Socialism: What’s the Difference?</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[When the State Brings the Bible Into the Classroom]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Texas has approved a required reading list that includes the Bible. Chris asks the central question: when does education become government-backed religious indoctrination?</p><p>The Bible is historically, culturally, and literarily important. So are the Quran, Torah, Hindu, Buddhist, and other religious texts that have shaped civilizations. The issue is not whether students should learn about religion. It is whether the government should elevate one faith above the rest.</p><p>Where should the line be drawn between education, religious liberty, and state endorsement?</p><p>Comment below. Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">df15961d-2f1a-4d2f-aff5-958411154853</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 18:27:53 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/c8a36fa8e74a94039f1ab4115321f8b7379b34f2d0f6b593312368b0592570f7/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJkZjE1OTYxZC0yZjFhLTRkMmYtYWZmNS05NTg0MTExNTQ4NTMiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE0NTViNWFhMjBkNzUyZGI4ZTJiZmYxL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi03LTFfXzIwLTI0LTI2Lm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5017330" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/df15961d-2f1a-4d2f-aff5-958411154853/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Texas has approved a required reading list that includes the Bible. Chris asks the central question: when does education become government-backed religious indoctrination?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Bible is historically, culturally, and literarily important. So are the Quran, Torah, Hindu, Buddhist, and other religious texts that have shaped civilizations. The issue is not whether students should learn about religion. It is whether the government should elevate one faith above the rest.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Where should the line be drawn between education, religious liberty, and state endorsement?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Comment below. Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:37</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>When the State Brings the Bible Into the Classroom</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Media Bias Is Real. Government Censorship Is Worse]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The media is biased. That is not new, and it is not the real danger.</p><p>The danger is when politicians use claims of “fairness,” “misinformation,” or “public protection” to pressure networks, threaten broadcast licenses, and gain control over what the public can hear.</p><p>You do not have to like <i>The View</i>, Jimmy Kimmel, Fox News, or any outlet you think gets it wrong. But the answer is not to give the government an off switch.</p><p>A free press includes speech you disagree with.</p><p>In this Fiercely Independent take, Chris breaks down why media bias is real, why government control of the press is not the cure, and how attacks on media freedom can become a much bigger threat than bad coverage.</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">f519af95-82fa-4055-9019-907b61534617</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 20:02:12 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/1a37d521b26efc292b7223e9f21f91333b55ac7f294722491c41c3a21b1edda9/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJmNTE5YWY5NS04MmZhLTQwNTUtOTAxOS05MDdiNjE1MzQ2MTciLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE0NDFmYzhhOTU1NmNlZjQxZDZmNzU0L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTMwX18yMS01OC0wLm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5020673" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/f519af95-82fa-4055-9019-907b61534617/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;The media is biased. That is not new, and it is not the real danger.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The danger is when politicians use claims of “fairness,” “misinformation,” or “public protection” to pressure networks, threaten broadcast licenses, and gain control over what the public can hear.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You do not have to like &lt;i&gt;The View&lt;/i&gt;, Jimmy Kimmel, Fox News, or any outlet you think gets it wrong. But the answer is not to give the government an off switch.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A free press includes speech you disagree with.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this Fiercely Independent take, Chris breaks down why media bias is real, why government control of the press is not the cure, and how attacks on media freedom can become a much bigger threat than bad coverage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:37</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Media Bias Is Real. Government Censorship Is Worse</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Spot the Spin: Why Political Name-Calling Works]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Political name-calling is easy to spot, but it is also incredibly effective.</p><p>In this week’s <i>Spot the Spin</i>, Chris breaks down the ad hominem fallacy: attacking a person’s character instead of addressing their argument. He looks at why personal attacks dominate modern politics, how outrage-driven media helps spread them, and why voters deserve more than slogans, nicknames, and manufactured conflict.</p><p>Democracy depends on informed debate. When politics becomes trash talk, the real issues disappear.</p><p>Subscribe for more independent political analysis from Fiercely Independent.</p><p>#SpotTheSpin #PoliticalMedia #AdHominem #PoliticalDiscourse #FiercelyIndependent</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">fdeda39c-a008-45c5-b087-8a5fcca8583e</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 19:05:21 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/c668a6aa84d9d1df206189f45dbc3d2a39c5e501c00475f141dd7b4028c0dbb5/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJmZGVkYTM5Yy1hMDA4LTQ1YzUtYjA4Ny04YTVmY2NhODU4M2UiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmE0MmMxMmMzMTFmODg5MDQ3YWM0NTdmL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTI5X18yMS0yLTQubXAzIn0=.mp3" length="5240520" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/fdeda39c-a008-45c5-b087-8a5fcca8583e/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Political name-calling is easy to spot, but it is also incredibly effective.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this week’s &lt;i&gt;Spot the Spin&lt;/i&gt;, Chris breaks down the ad hominem fallacy: attacking a person’s character instead of addressing their argument. He looks at why personal attacks dominate modern politics, how outrage-driven media helps spread them, and why voters deserve more than slogans, nicknames, and manufactured conflict.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Democracy depends on informed debate. When politics becomes trash talk, the real issues disappear.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Subscribe for more independent political analysis from Fiercely Independent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#SpotTheSpin #PoliticalMedia #AdHominem #PoliticalDiscourse #FiercelyIndependent&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:44</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Spot the Spin: Why Political Name-Calling Works</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[The $87.6 Billion War Bill: Who Really Pays?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>War is often presented like a clean, decisive show of strength. Then the bill arrives.</p><p>In this episode, Chris breaks down the White House’s request for an additional $87.6 billion for the Iran war, on top of an already massive defense budget. This is not an argument against national defense. It is an argument for asking questions before the costs become permanent.</p><p>Why is accountability treated as weakness until Congress has to approve the money? And why are healthcare, housing, schools, and veterans’ benefits called too expensive, while billions for war can appear almost overnight?</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">3d6ec830-ba06-41aa-a6d5-6b70d6f6201b</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 19:35:24 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/70e0ab464fdd9affedcc64710334349aa8aa7b12eff5d5b7d9c88e414f53adf3/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIzZDZlYzgzMC1iYTA2LTQxYWEtYTZkNS02YjcwZDZmNjIwMWIiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmEzZWQzYTU0Mjg5MGVlZGY3OWRmNGE3L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTI2X18yMS0zMS00OS5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5103429" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/3d6ec830-ba06-41aa-a6d5-6b70d6f6201b/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;War is often presented like a clean, decisive show of strength. Then the bill arrives.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this episode, Chris breaks down the White House’s request for an additional $87.6 billion for the Iran war, on top of an already massive defense budget. This is not an argument against national defense. It is an argument for asking questions before the costs become permanent.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Why is accountability treated as weakness until Congress has to approve the money? And why are healthcare, housing, schools, and veterans’ benefits called too expensive, while billions for war can appear almost overnight?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:39</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>The $87.6 Billion War Bill: Who Really Pays?</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Privacy Under Attack: Could Your Medical Records Be Next?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>A judge has blocked the DOJ from accessing private medical records tied to transgender healthcare for minors. But this goes beyond one issue.</p><p>When the government uses subpoenas and investigations to reach into private medical decisions, the question becomes bigger: where does it stop?</p><p>Today it may be transgender healthcare. Tomorrow, it could involve abortion records, fertility treatment, mental-health care, or any other private decision the government decides to target.</p><p>Privacy rights cannot depend on whether people approve of the patient, the treatment, or the politics involved. Rights either apply to everyone, or they are privileges handed out selectively.</p><p>This is Fiercely Independent. Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">1ca52fc5-8190-49bf-8eeb-2f46a70566dd</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 19:55:13 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/a7fd2b8364cfb0da26650863f926fb20f1e718d8789c9da48893d96a3f3c66e0/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIxY2E1MmZjNS04MTkwLTQ5YmYtOGVlYi0yZjQ2YTcwNTY2ZGQiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmEzZDg2OGUyYTJhNWIxYmU4Yzk1YTAyL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTI1X18yMS01MC0zOC5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5631730" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/1ca52fc5-8190-49bf-8eeb-2f46a70566dd/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;A judge has blocked the DOJ from accessing private medical records tied to transgender healthcare for minors. But this goes beyond one issue.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When the government uses subpoenas and investigations to reach into private medical decisions, the question becomes bigger: where does it stop?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Today it may be transgender healthcare. Tomorrow, it could involve abortion records, fertility treatment, mental-health care, or any other private decision the government decides to target.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Privacy rights cannot depend on whether people approve of the patient, the treatment, or the politics involved. Rights either apply to everyone, or they are privileges handed out selectively.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is Fiercely Independent. Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:56</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Privacy Under Attack: Could Your Medical Records Be Next?</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Is Democratic Socialism the Democrats’ Tea Party Moment?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Is democratic socialism becoming the anti-establishment force reshaping the Democratic Party?</p><p>After New York’s recent political shockwave, Chris breaks down the growing frustration with Democratic leadership, what democratic socialism actually means, and whether this movement is a needed wake-up call or the start of a deeper party realignment.</p><p>Is this a demand for better Democratic leadership, or the beginning of a replacement movement?</p><p></p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2add3716-6fd8-4e45-83b8-f83f69c35dfe</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 19:55:43 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/53b2897995c0d5523eab5780a74bb942153393f7e3768f638231abc4a30090a3/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIyYWRkMzcxNi02ZmQ4LTRlNDUtODNiOC1mODNmNjljMzVkZmUiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmEzYzM1MjMzMGI1Y2RkZmM2NTA3ZDRmL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTI0X18yMS01MC01OS5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5287331" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/2add3716-6fd8-4e45-83b8-f83f69c35dfe/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Is democratic socialism becoming the anti-establishment force reshaping the Democratic Party?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After New York’s recent political shockwave, Chris breaks down the growing frustration with Democratic leadership, what democratic socialism actually means, and whether this movement is a needed wake-up call or the start of a deeper party realignment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Is this a demand for better Democratic leadership, or the beginning of a replacement movement?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:45</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Is Democratic Socialism the Democrats’ Tea Party Moment?</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Big Tech vs. Voters: The AI Fight]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>AI is not just another version of the internet.</p><p>It can make decisions, create content, write code, influence healthcare, policing, warfare, finance, elections, and more. So who gets to write the rules before this technology reshapes everyday life?</p><p>In this episode, Fiercely Independent breaks down the growing battle over AI regulation, Big Tech’s political influence, surveillance risks, bias, misinformation, and the false choice politicians keep pushing: regulate AI or fall behind.</p><p>That is not the real choice.</p><p>The real question is whether AI will serve people, or whether powerful companies and billionaire tech interests will lock in the rules before voters have a say.</p><p>Comment below: Should AI companies face stronger public oversight?</p><p>#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #BigTech #AIRegulation #Politics #Surveillance #Democracy #FiercelyIndependent</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">dfc99a48-3f81-4a59-8b15-9a834861e352</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 18:58:57 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/1be78f3f45448daf71ab71f9b22e2998531bf26f188573269ddea0b33f36c6e5/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJkZmM5OWE0OC0zZjgxLTRhNTktOGIxNS05YTgzNDg2MWUzNTIiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmEzYWQ0NjhjNjhlYzQ4MjhmNGVhZDIzL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTIzX18yMC00Ni0wLm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5321604" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/dfc99a48-3f81-4a59-8b15-9a834861e352/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;AI is not just another version of the internet.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It can make decisions, create content, write code, influence healthcare, policing, warfare, finance, elections, and more. So who gets to write the rules before this technology reshapes everyday life?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this episode, Fiercely Independent breaks down the growing battle over AI regulation, Big Tech’s political influence, surveillance risks, bias, misinformation, and the false choice politicians keep pushing: regulate AI or fall behind.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That is not the real choice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The real question is whether AI will serve people, or whether powerful companies and billionaire tech interests will lock in the rules before voters have a say.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Comment below: Should AI companies face stronger public oversight?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;#AI #ArtificialIntelligence #BigTech #AIRegulation #Politics #Surveillance #Democracy #FiercelyIndependent&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:46</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Big Tech vs. Voters: The AI Fight</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Spot the Spin: The False Dilemma]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Politicians and pundits love forcing complicated issues into two extreme choices: support everything they want, or be accused of supporting the worst possible alternative.</p><p>That is called a <b>false dilemma</b>.</p><p>In this episode of <i>Spot the Spin</i>, Chris breaks down how false dilemmas work, why they are effective, and how to recognize the trick when someone says you are either with them or against them.</p><p>Real issues involve trade-offs, consequences, and more than two possible answers. Fear is easier to sell than nuance.</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">5826fb43-171a-4691-8457-d9595eea6484</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 20:29:55 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/343a2b2ff814523311fa4d0da91d5fd6dbdc9d51957dce770506ffced7046b7b/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI1ODI2ZmI0My0xNzFhLTQ2OTEtODQ1Ny1kOTU5NWVlYTY0ODQiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmEzOTlhMDExYzY2NzhiZWJhMDE4NDI5L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTIyX18yMi0yNC0zMy5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="4891942" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/5826fb43-171a-4691-8457-d9595eea6484/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Politicians and pundits love forcing complicated issues into two extreme choices: support everything they want, or be accused of supporting the worst possible alternative.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That is called a &lt;b&gt;false dilemma&lt;/b&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this episode of &lt;i&gt;Spot the Spin&lt;/i&gt;, Chris breaks down how false dilemmas work, why they are effective, and how to recognize the trick when someone says you are either with them or against them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Real issues involve trade-offs, consequences, and more than two possible answers. Fear is easier to sell than nuance.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:33</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Spot the Spin: The False Dilemma</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Juneteenth Is Not About Guilt. It’s About Truth]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Juneteenth marks June 19, 1865, when enslaved people in Texas finally received word that they were free, more than two years after the Emancipation Proclamation.</p><p>This is not a day to sanitize America’s past, demonize the country, or turn history into another political weapon. It is a day to recognize the truth: America has extraordinary ideals, has often failed to live up to them, and is strongest when it confronts its failures instead of denying them.</p><p>Freedom delayed is freedom denied. Celebrate Juneteenth for what it represents: redemption, resilience, and the capacity to become better.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">02140adb-4eb1-4b10-a47f-c56127392b5b</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 19:58:43 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/3882014930e878d28eb2795b7392a437f44527985867dc2cb42844174ef16ae8/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIwMjE0MGFkYi00ZWIxLTRiMTAtYTQ3Zi1jNTYxMjczOTJiNWIiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmEzNTllYmI5YTdhMzA0Y2NlZTRhNWRlL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTE5X18yMS01NS0zOS5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="3428249" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/02140adb-4eb1-4b10-a47f-c56127392b5b/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Juneteenth marks June 19, 1865, when enslaved people in Texas finally received word that they were free, more than two years after the Emancipation Proclamation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is not a day to sanitize America’s past, demonize the country, or turn history into another political weapon. It is a day to recognize the truth: America has extraordinary ideals, has often failed to live up to them, and is strongest when it confronts its failures instead of denying them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Freedom delayed is freedom denied. Celebrate Juneteenth for what it represents: redemption, resilience, and the capacity to become better.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:01:47</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Juneteenth Is Not About Guilt. It’s About Truth</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Fight to Keep the Fed Independent]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>There’s a fight brewing over the Federal Reserve, and it matters more than most voters realize.</p><p>The Fed affects inflation, interest rates, hiring, business growth, and retirement savings. That’s exactly why it should not be controlled by any president, Democrat or Republican. Political control of interest rates opens the door to corruption, market manipulation, self-dealing, and short-term decisions that could create long-term economic damage.</p><p>Independence does not mean zero accountability. The Federal Reserve still needs oversight, transparency, criticism, and public scrutiny. But letting politicians call the shots on interest rates would be dangerous for everyone.</p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">4ef629e9-314a-45a0-b1e0-2768743f8ed8</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 20:14:22 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/54b69bfd2573dedb66223cae26ae25b9ffa89fbbdda260c8adfd85bad50aa488/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI0ZWY2MjllOS0zMTRhLTQ1YTAtYjFlMC0yNzY4NzQzZjhlZDgiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmEzNDUwYjQ4OGY5N2ZkNjM4Zjc3OTEzL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTE4X18yMi0xMC0yOC5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="5928481" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/4ef629e9-314a-45a0-b1e0-2768743f8ed8/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;There’s a fight brewing over the Federal Reserve, and it matters more than most voters realize.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Fed affects inflation, interest rates, hiring, business growth, and retirement savings. That’s exactly why it should not be controlled by any president, Democrat or Republican. Political control of interest rates opens the door to corruption, market manipulation, self-dealing, and short-term decisions that could create long-term economic damage.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Independence does not mean zero accountability. The Federal Reserve still needs oversight, transparency, criticism, and public scrutiny. But letting politicians call the shots on interest rates would be dangerous for everyone.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:03:05</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>The Fight to Keep the Fed Independent</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[National Security Is Becoming a Political Bargaining Chip]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>When politics puts national security at risk, everyone loses.</p><p>In this episode of <b>Fiercely Independent</b>, Chris breaks down how intelligence, FISA, DNI leadership, and partisan deal-making are becoming tangled together in ways that should concern every voter. The issue is not just left versus right. The issue is what happens when national defense tools and supposedly neutral institutions become leverage in political fights.</p><p>From the appointment of Bill Pulte as acting DNI to the fight over Section 702 of FISA and the nomination of Jay Clayton, this story raises a bigger question: are we letting politics weaken the very systems meant to protect the country?</p><p>Because when national security becomes a bargaining chip, America’s adversaries are the ones who benefit.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">cad237fb-b4cc-4832-8504-0fc64ecdaada</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 21:24:15 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/554bd3417efc655a6cf2dd6dce5b9097d8290641f0d37802938eb5245f483eff/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJjYWQyMzdmYi1iNGNjLTQ4MzItODUwNC0wZmM2NGVjZGFhZGEiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmEzMzBkODY5MTdmNDcxM2VlNTYwYWY5L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTE3X18yMy0xMS0zNC5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="4901973" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/cad237fb-b4cc-4832-8504-0fc64ecdaada/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;When politics puts national security at risk, everyone loses.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this episode of &lt;b&gt;Fiercely Independent&lt;/b&gt;, Chris breaks down how intelligence, FISA, DNI leadership, and partisan deal-making are becoming tangled together in ways that should concern every voter. The issue is not just left versus right. The issue is what happens when national defense tools and supposedly neutral institutions become leverage in political fights.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;From the appointment of Bill Pulte as acting DNI to the fight over Section 702 of FISA and the nomination of Jay Clayton, this story raises a bigger question: are we letting politics weaken the very systems meant to protect the country?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Because when national security becomes a bargaining chip, America’s adversaries are the ones who benefit.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:33</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>National Security Is Becoming a Political Bargaining Chip</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Wall Street Wants Your Social Security]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>They want you to believe Social Security is running out of options. That is the trap. The real question is who benefits if your retirement gets handed to Wall Street.</p><p></p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">c2de2c53-c24c-4900-89ef-f66de5824162</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 20:21:55 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/ba36f2f2d86d5c0f14bdd6abb93a9f7d1b97fe2503d0259e70d95289d9e5c825/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJjMmRlMmM1My1jMjRjLTQ5MDAtODllZi1mNjZkZTU4MjQxNjIiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmEzMWE2MDg2ODk0ZjcyNTg2M2MxMDZmL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTE2X18yMS0zNy00My5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="4772406" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/c2de2c53-c24c-4900-89ef-f66de5824162/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;They want you to believe Social Security is running out of options. That is the trap. The real question is who benefits if your retirement gets handed to Wall Street.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:29</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Wall Street Wants Your Social Security</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Shocking $70 Billion Government Spending Waste Exposed!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>DHS receives an additional $70 billion, on top of $140 billion, despite claims of record low border crossings. This discussion focuses on government spending and the law of diminishing returns</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">42a8c0af-d081-4428-9433-dc2da93c2c28</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:07:18 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/3fd6d43f1a4736b5386b80fa52c9beaffe2a72545052485f995d1391ac68ae60/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI0MmE4YzBhZi1kMDgxLTQ0MjgtOTQzMy1kYzJkYTkzYzJjMjgiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmEzMTNjYjE2ZmRkNjMyZjk5Zjg1OWFiL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTE2X18xNC04LTE3Lm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="4824232" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/42a8c0af-d081-4428-9433-dc2da93c2c28/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;DHS receives an additional $70 billion, on top of $140 billion, despite claims of record low border crossings. This discussion focuses on government spending and the law of diminishing returns&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:31</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Shocking $70 Billion Government Spending Waste Exposed!</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Villain Game]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Politics loves a villain. But when opponents become enemies, the game gets dangerous. Chris breaks down how both parties use fear, foils, and outrage, and asks what independents should really be standing against.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2789d1c5-5c68-45fc-aa18-f4970501a111</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:50:47 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/00f32aec62aecbdc0d3521e59d898b8f635052585c77cb7b14a206d4a73babef/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIyNzg5ZDFjNS01YzY4LTQ1ZmMtYWExOC1mNDk3MDUwMWExMTEiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmEyYzRjYzU5OTI3YmNkZGM1MzVmMmRkL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTEyX18yMC0xNS0zMy5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="4965503" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/2789d1c5-5c68-45fc-aa18-f4970501a111/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Politics loves a villain. But when opponents become enemies, the game gets dangerous. Chris breaks down how both parties use fear, foils, and outrage, and asks what independents should really be standing against.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:35</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:season>1</itunes:season><itunes:episode>4</itunes:episode><itunes:title>The Villain Game</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Does Character Still Matter?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Does character still matter in public office, or have both parties lowered the standard so far that voters are left choosing between flawed candidates?</p><p></p><p>In this episode of <b>Fiercely Independent</b>, Chris looks back at the Gary Hart scandal of 1987 and compares that political moment to today’s environment, where serious character concerns no longer seem to end campaigns the way they once did. From Ken Paxton to Graham Platner to the hypocrisy on both sides, this episode asks a direct question: are voters being forced to accept the “lesser of two evils” instead of candidates they can actually trust?</p><p></p><p>This is not about defending one party over another. It is about demanding better from both.</p><p></p><p>Stay fierce. Stay independent.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">2ef417df-1d8b-4acb-ae4a-8546939c5a63</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:41:47 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/d031e28b7ccca104aaec51db0df3d9fe54a33dff49434b0eb03dbdb6a54c7678/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiIyZWY0MTdkZi0xZDhiLTRhY2ItYWU0YS04NTQ2OTM5YzVhNjMiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmEyYjM5YWJhOTE5YzQ3ZjU5NTA5YzliL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTEyX18wLTQxLTQ3Lm1wMyJ9.mp3" length="5247207" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/2ef417df-1d8b-4acb-ae4a-8546939c5a63/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Does character still matter in public office, or have both parties lowered the standard so far that voters are left choosing between flawed candidates?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this episode of &lt;b&gt;Fiercely Independent&lt;/b&gt;, Chris looks back at the Gary Hart scandal of 1987 and compares that political moment to today’s environment, where serious character concerns no longer seem to end campaigns the way they once did. From Ken Paxton to Graham Platner to the hypocrisy on both sides, this episode asks a direct question: are voters being forced to accept the “lesser of two evils” instead of candidates they can actually trust?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is not about defending one party over another. It is about demanding better from both.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stay fierce. Stay independent.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:44</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:season>1</itunes:season><itunes:episode>3</itunes:episode><itunes:title>Does Character Still Matter?</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[When Everything Is a Crisis]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>When every news cycle is treated like a crisis, the real issues get harder to see. Chris breaks down why independent voters need more substance, less outrage, and better information from both the media and elected officials.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">71ed7684-39b3-4ea8-b57d-175510c50e23</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 22:11:08 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/87a61ad4d68a740131a525784149d461b101f1113720f83dcc20067afeccfc18/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiI3MWVkNzY4NC0zOWIzLTRlYTgtYjU3ZC0xNzU1MTBjNTBlMjMiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmEyODhmN2RiOTgwNmJlMDI4MGQ2NDdhL2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTEwX18wLTExLTkubXAzIn0=.mp3" length="6417493" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/71ed7684-39b3-4ea8-b57d-175510c50e23/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;When every news cycle is treated like a crisis, the real issues get harder to see. Chris breaks down why independent voters need more substance, less outrage, and better information from both the media and elected officials.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:03:20</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:season>1</itunes:season><itunes:episode>2</itunes:episode><itunes:title>When Everything Is a Crisis</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item><item><title><![CDATA[Truth Over Theater]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Chris kicks off Fiercely Independent with a blunt look at political theater, media spin, and the stories driving America’s divided conversation. No party line, no scripted outrage, just an independent take for people who still think for themselves.</p>]]></description><guid isPermaLink="false">cb56d1d9-d7da-466f-89b8-f00d79524662</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 16:01:38 GMT</pubDate><enclosure url="https://api.riverside.com/hosting-analytics/media/0d8082efb5456876bdd0be3505bc3f7df38bd641062b020f7c21745c3d94bf9c/eyJlcGlzb2RlSWQiOiJjYjU2ZDFkOS1kN2RhLTQ2NmYtODliOC1mMDBkNzk1MjQ2NjIiLCJwb2RjYXN0SWQiOiJiM2Y4NmI4OS01Njg1LTRlZmQtOGViYi05MGI1MjM5ZGE0ZGMiLCJhY2NvdW50SWQiOiI2YTIzYjM5NWI3MjU3ZjQ0YWFmMTIwMTMiLCJwYXRoIjoibWVkaWEvY2xpcHMvNmEyODM4ZjliNzkyYTg3NTg4Y2YzYjU0L2Nocmlzcy1zdHVkaW8tYTVEVDYtY29tcG9zZXItMjAyNi02LTlfXzE4LTItMS5tcDMifQ==.mp3" length="4158006" type="audio/mpeg"/><podcast:transcript url="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/episodes/cb56d1d9-d7da-466f-89b8-f00d79524662/transcripts.txt" type="text/plain"/><itunes:summary>&lt;p&gt;Chris kicks off Fiercely Independent with a blunt look at political theater, media spin, and the stories driving America’s divided conversation. No party line, no scripted outrage, just an independent take for people who still think for themselves.&lt;/p&gt;</itunes:summary><itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit><itunes:duration>00:02:10</itunes:duration><itunes:image href="https://hosting-media.riverside.com/media/podcasts/b3f86b89-5685-4efd-8ebb-90b5239da4dc/logos/40fd78b5-d7e2-4d32-8b1c-7375cba38694.png"/><itunes:title>Truth Over Theater</itunes:title><itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType></item></channel></rss>