<![CDATA[Law In Depth]]>Each episode explains complex legal issues using real scenarios—clear, direct, and practical.

No legal jargon. No fluff. Just the law as it applies to you.

Subscribe for short, sharp legal insights that change how you think about everyday situations.

]]>https://riverside.comRiverside.fm (https://riverside.com)Thu, 28 May 2026 02:11:41 GMTFri, 01 May 2026 04:47:17 GMT60Lawindepth<p>Each episode explains complex legal issues using real scenarios—clear, direct, and practical.</p><p>No legal jargon. No fluff. Just the law as it applies to you.</p><p>Subscribe for short, sharp legal insights that change how you think about everyday situations.</p>episodicLawindepthlawindepth1@gmail.comno<![CDATA[Is your Doctor Liable? Informed Consent and Substandard treatment ]]>The conversation delves into the Bolam test, informed consent, and the shift of power from doctors to patients. It emphasizes the importance of informed consent and material risks in medical procedures, highlighting the impact on medical culture and the legal framework.

Takeaways

  • Bolam test and informed consent
  • Shift of power from doctor to patient
  • Importance of informed consent and material risks

Chapters

  • 00:00 Introduction to Medical Negligence
  • 06:51 Rogers v Whitaker and Informed Consent
  • 13:20 Informed Consent and Material Risks
  • 22:28 The Impact on Medical Culture
]]>466c2c1c-74a3-444b-9f31-65881806e89bTue, 26 May 2026 08:55:59 GMT<p>The conversation delves into the Bolam test, informed consent, and the shift of power from doctors to patients. It emphasizes the importance of informed consent and material risks in medical procedures, highlighting the impact on medical culture and the legal framework.</p><p></p><p>Takeaways</p><ul><li>Bolam test and informed consent</li><li>Shift of power from doctor to patient</li><li>Importance of informed consent and material risks</li></ul><p></p><p>Chapters</p><ul><li>00:00 Introduction to Medical Negligence</li><li>06:51 Rogers v Whitaker and Informed Consent</li><li>13:20 Informed Consent and Material Risks</li><li>22:28 The Impact on Medical Culture</li></ul>no00:16:593Is your Doctor Liable? Informed Consent and Substandard treatment full<![CDATA[Workplace Trauma & compensation]]>Learn more about PTSD and grief in the workplace and whether you can get compensation.

]]>60f2c831-cab9-41b3-8dce-ce9d7a46f6efWed, 13 May 2026 07:06:39 GMT<p>Learn more about PTSD and grief in the workplace and whether you can get compensation. </p>no00:21:012Workplace Trauma & compensationfull<![CDATA[Bullying in the Workplace]]>The episode delves into the legal aspects of psychological harm in the workplace, covering the Fair Work Commission's jurisdiction, work health safety and criminal liability, and common law negligence. It explores the definitions, thresholds, and successful findings of workplace bullying, as well as landmark cases that set legal precedents for psychological harm in the workplace.

Takeaways

  • Psychological harm in the workplace is governed by three overlapping legal regimes: Fair Work Commission's jurisdiction, work health safety and criminal liability, and common law negligence.
  • Workplace bullying must meet specific thresholds and criteria to be legally recognized, and successful findings of workplace bullying are based on repetitive and sustained harmful behavior.
  • Landmark cases, such as Newcastle Wallsend Coal vs. Work Cover and Naidu vs. Group 4 Securities, have set legal precedents for psychological harm in the workplace, establishing employer responsibilities and liability.

Chapters

  • 00:00 Understanding Legal Regimes for Psychological Harm
  • 05:28 Thresholds and Criteria for Workplace Bullying
  • 10:39 Successful Findings of Workplace Bullying
  • 21:10 Common Law Negligence and Legal Precedents
]]>00afdb41-d8e5-4bc8-9cad-ec59b9b5d02eFri, 01 May 2026 04:49:26 GMT<p>The episode delves into the legal aspects of psychological harm in the workplace, covering the Fair Work Commission's jurisdiction, work health safety and criminal liability, and common law negligence. It explores the definitions, thresholds, and successful findings of workplace bullying, as well as landmark cases that set legal precedents for psychological harm in the workplace.</p><p></p><p>Takeaways</p><ul><li>Psychological harm in the workplace is governed by three overlapping legal regimes: Fair Work Commission's jurisdiction, work health safety and criminal liability, and common law negligence.</li><li>Workplace bullying must meet specific thresholds and criteria to be legally recognized, and successful findings of workplace bullying are based on repetitive and sustained harmful behavior.</li><li>Landmark cases, such as Newcastle Wallsend Coal vs. Work Cover and Naidu vs. Group 4 Securities, have set legal precedents for psychological harm in the workplace, establishing employer responsibilities and liability.</li></ul><p></p><p>Chapters</p><ul><li>00:00 Understanding Legal Regimes for Psychological Harm</li><li>05:28 Thresholds and Criteria for Workplace Bullying</li><li>10:39 Successful Findings of Workplace Bullying</li><li>21:10 Common Law Negligence and Legal Precedents</li></ul>no00:19:311Bullying in the Workplacefull